Date:11/20/2014 3:44 AM (GMT-05:00)

To: dev

Subject: Re: Advised= to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to 4.4.1

I looked up the field that other people reported on the mailing lis= t. > > ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT NULL DEFAU= LT '1' > > Can you try this in your upgraded system and restart? > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Matthew Midgett > wrote: >> 4.4.2-Snapshot fails at the same >> Starting com.cloud.bridge.service.controller.s3.ServiceProvider_Enhancer= ByCloudStack_8d3a94eb >> >> CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may cont= ain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protecte= d from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any diss= emination or use of this electronic email or its contents (including any at= tachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly proh= ibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me immed= iately by reply email so that I may correct my internal records. Please th= en delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entirety.= Thank you. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:20 AM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to 4.4= .1 >> >> No, this would be for testing only! >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Matthew Midgett wrote: >>> How do I go about doing this with centos 6.5 management servers and wil= l there be a upgrade migration path back to 4.4.2 release? >>> >>> >>> Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S=C2=AE III >>> >>>

-------- Original message --------

From: Daan Hoogland >>>

Date:11/19/2014 4:54 AM >>> (GMT-05:00)

To: dev

S= ubject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to 4.4.1 <= /div>

Can you try upgrading to 4.4.2-SNAPSHOT (meaning the lates= t state of the 4.4 branch)? to see if there is a difference there. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: >>>> please sand them to daan hoogland on gmail if it needs to be private >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Matthew Midgett >>>> wrote: >>>>> It=E2=80=99s a few lines and Dan If you would like to view them I can= send them to you. The problem lies in the network part. >>>>> >>>>> CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may c= ontain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise prote= cted from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any d= issemination or use of this electronic email or its contents (including any= attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly p= rohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me im= mediately by reply email so that I may correct my internal records. Please= then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entire= ty. Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:20 AM >>>>> To: dev >>>>> Subject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to >>>>> 4.4.1 >>>>> >>>>> Matthew, How big is the diff? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Matthew Midgett wrote: >>>>>> Thanks Nux I realized that after I posted but had to leave the offic= e. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I side note I did the upgrade again yesterday and it failed at st= arting the bridge networking. I dropped the DB and set it up like a fresh = install and that worked. I uploaded the upgraded db and it still failed to = start so I decided to diff them. I then ran win merge and merged a lot of = lines and it started again. My network was not showing correctly and that = made since, since it would fail at the part. I spent most of the day yester= day mucking around the db before I said screw it and rolled the upgrade bac= k. I am 100% sure that the problem is in the db upgrade. What I really need= it is to give someone my pre update db and my post update db and let them = run compare the two. I am sure that a developer can help me. There was ano= ther user that was posting on my original email on the user list and his ma= nagement server was failing at the same spot so it might not be related to = just me. >>>>>> >>>>>> My Db's of course contain sensitive information and I don't want to = just add a link for everyone to see. What is the best practice for this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may = contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise prot= ected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any = dissemination or use of this electronic email or its contents (including an= y attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly = prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me i= mmediately by reply email so that I may correct my internal records. Pleas= e then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entir= ety. Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Matthew Midgett >>>>>> [mailto:cloudstck@trick-solutions.com.INVALID] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 6:49 AM >>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to >>>>>> 4.4.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried again to update from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1 with centos management >>>>>> server and xenserver 6.2. Here is the logs from the management >>>>>> server and the catalina.out >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/mS0wjug7 >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/gwVCitvb >>>>>> >>>>>> I did fresh install with a single vm witg the db and management serv= er on the same host just installed just fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> What should I do next ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Daan >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >> >> >> >> -- >> Daan >> > > > > -- > Daan --=20 Daan