Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.85.212.173 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of lbarfield@tqhosting.com)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMvtBPNaPDCXsLkJe-64esRSH83gssRD4KRGWEqvYGD0n+u16w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMvtBPNkf2eCabPp55POPOtfceAzUBn-Q7b+zsb8scnPUAgTGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMvtBPNaPDCXsLkJe-64esRSH83gssRD4KRGWEqvYGD0n+u16w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:37:51 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CACKLxkBD_ciLgBM9zEUoraPjHmC1zGqNswAewpRA0VT9sniVHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: KVM VM snapshots any time soon ?
From: Logan Barfield <lbarfield@tqhosting.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d139c8bbec3050720e069

--089e013d139c8bbec3050720e069
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is a feature we would like to see as well.

Does KVM have native support for VM/Memory snapshotting?  If so what are
the barriers to getting this implemented?


Thank You,

Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Anybody ?
>
> On 3 November 2014 15:23, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > do we have any plans in some near future to imlement full VM KVM
> > snapshots. So not single volume snaphost, but a reall VM snapshots. It =
is
> > already there for Xen/VMware, but not KVM.
> >
> > Any thoughts, ETA, or difficulties to implement this ?
> > Any feedback greatly appriciated...
> >
> > Best,
> >
> >
> > Andrija Pani=C4=87
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Pani=C4=87
> --------------------------------------
>   http://admintweets.com
> --------------------------------------
>

--089e013d139c8bbec3050720e069--