cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?
Date Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:44:19 GMT
I agree that more tests are welcome, we have to try then :)

> Afaik non-pmc's aren't binding and any votes would merely be an
indication,
> or do i  misunderstand?

All votes are important [1] and count as indicator, who ever vote mean
something, It also show that the community members did some tests  or
review of some kind. And whoever doing a -1 with valid justification will
be listen. It would be much more interesting to see an RC with 15 non
binding votes than the  3 minimum binding.

[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html



On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:

> Den søndag 16. november 2014 skrev Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion891@apache.org>
> følgende:
>
> > I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@
> > related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an
> RC
> > it would potentially involved more people in the test phases.
> >
> >
> I must disagree. Creating cloudstack is indeed a dev thing, but if you look
> at the last releases and the trouble they had we should look at and embrace
> any way to improve testing. Using simulator and spinning up basic zones can
> only reveal a minority of issues.
>
> Afaik non-pmc's aren't binding and any votes would merely be an indication,
> or do i  misunderstand?
>
> But i do agree that providing packages are crucial, that would help us
> discover packaging problems as well
>
> Erik
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message