cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Unreleased 4.4.1 packages on cloudstack.apt-get.eu, why?
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:08:17 GMT
Adrian, the argument against publishing RCs IIRC was that we then would
need to support upgrade paths from those as well.

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Adrian,
>
> I think the forum idea has been discussed previously, unsuccessfully.
> Imho the idea itself is good, but our small community might get spread too
> thin between the lists and forum.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Adrian Lewis" <adrian@alsiconsulting.co.uk>
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, 10 October, 2014 13:23:45
> > Subject: RE: Unreleased 4.4.1 packages on cloudstack.apt-get.eu, why?
>
> > Perhaps it's just me being lazy but I reckon that having defined 'beta'
> and
> > RC packages available for download (with some form of marketing to inform
> > people) would likely increase the sample size for testing, including
> > different use cases. I'm pretty sure that there are a number of people
> that
> > fit the sysadmin role rather than the devops or developer role who just
> > won't go to the effort of trying to work out what to checkout, build and
> > package themselves even if they did know how to. I realise that the
> audience
> > for CS may be different to many other OS software projects out there but
> > most well-used projects (including many commercial ones) that I work
> with go
> > through this process. The only other issue would be that of feedback - I
> > know it's an Apache thing but an online forum site would really make
> > providing feedback much easier than the mailing list.
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nux! [mailto:nux@li.nux.ro]
> > Sent: 10 October 2014 09:24
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Unreleased 4.4.1 packages on cloudstack.apt-get.eu, why?
> >
> > Yes that's not a bad idea. At some point we had a chat with Hugo and
> David
> > about having jenkins generate RPMs with incremented version and setup a
> repo
> > for them which lead me to believe that at least Jenkins is capable of
> that.
> >
> > So, whoever is in charge of Jenkins, how can we achieve this?
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Erik Weber" <terbolous@gmail.com>
> >> To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, 10 October, 2014 09:10:35
> >> Subject: Re: Unreleased 4.4.1 packages on cloudstack.apt-get.eu, why?
> >
> >> Or make a different folder for unreleased versions?
> >> That way you could upload daily builds as well if you ever wanted to
> >>
> >> How about
> >> - a stable/release folder, where released versions go
> >> - a rc folder, for official release versions
> >> - a nightly/dev folder, for either a nightly version or the latest
> >> master build
> >>
> >> Couple it with jenkins and it would be easy for testers to verify that
> >> a bug is fixed by upgrading their RC or dev version
> >>
> >> --
> >> Erik
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Daan Hoogland
> >> <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I was thinking about that. I shouldn't have done this upload but had
> >>> a reason to. I want to make these available for testers. maybe i can
> >>> upload them without adding them to the rpm index...?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Perhaps we need a testing repo for non-final packages?
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>> >
> >>> > Nux!
> >>> > www.nux.ro
> >>> >
> >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > > From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >>> > > To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >>> > > Sent: Thursday, 9 October, 2014 17:42:50
> >>> > > Subject: Re: Unreleased 4.4.1 packages on cloudstack.apt-get.eu,
> why?
> >>> >
> >>> > > i did
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Ian Duffy <ian@ianduffy.ie>
wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Wildo,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Do we have no kind of audit on uploads?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On 9 October 2014 12:25, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > On 10/09/2014 01:21 PM, Nux! wrote:
> >>> > >> > > Hello,
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > I've noticed there are 4.4.1 packages on
> >>> > >> > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.4/.
> >>> > >> > > Since 4.4.0 is latest release, how come? This is
bad, people
> >>> > >> > > will
> >>> > >> > install broken stuff.
> >>> > >> > > Can anyone fix this?
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > I removed the packages, but I'm not sure who uploaded
them.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > They were uploaded on September 30th at 11:12 CET.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > Wido
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > > Lucian
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > --
> >>> > >> > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > Nux!
> >>> > >> > > www.nux.ro
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Daan
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> > >> Daan
>



-- 
Daan

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message