Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C113711F15 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40476 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2014 13:35:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 40424 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2014 13:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 40403 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2014 13:35:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown mxmx:stratosec-co.mail.eo.outlook.comip4:184.172.14.119~allmx (nike.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of jlk@stratosec.co) Received: from [65.55.169.81] (HELO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (65.55.169.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:28 +0000 Received: from DM2PR05MB959.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.159.148) by DM2PR05MB960.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.159.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1029.13; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:25 +0000 Received: from DM2PR05MB959.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.159.148]) by DM2PR05MB959.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.159.148]) with mapi id 15.00.1029.000; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:25 +0000 From: John Kinsella To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" CC: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Future Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Future Thread-Index: AQHP0Y23nuXkhFZPg0u88LMKuYgaapwD+dCAgABlsYCAAGZ0gIAACdSAgACFlQA= Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <82D0CC63-CEBB-4CC0-BD6A-D7ECD54FC84A@stratosec.co> <99DFD18C-9E53-43E6-8F63-30B5F95F71D5@shapeblue.com> In-Reply-To: <99DFD18C-9E53-43E6-8F63-30B5F95F71D5@shapeblue.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [208.87.61.102] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0337AFFE9A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(199003)(377454003)(189002)(24454002)(64706001)(107046002)(66066001)(97736003)(90102001)(76176999)(4396001)(77982003)(80022003)(81542003)(79102003)(106116001)(87936001)(36756003)(74662003)(83072002)(74502003)(33656002)(46102003)(99286002)(95666004)(105586002)(92566001)(2501002)(81342003)(106356001)(101416001)(93886004)(50986999)(2656002)(82746002)(54356999)(92726001)(16236675004)(99396002)(85852003)(19580395003)(86362001)(85306004)(74482002)(83322001)(2351001)(19580405001)(76482002)(31966008)(21056001)(20776003)(110136001)(83716003)(104396001)(42262002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:DM2PR05MB960;H:DM2PR05MB959.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A3BE02194D4A449B914DB9287AB5E582stratosecco_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: stratosec.co X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_A3BE02194D4A449B914DB9287AB5E582stratosecco_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ah, from that POV. Gotchya. I think also making it easier to develop the UI= would help. Feels like a big black box to me, and probably to others=85 On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:37 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: So, most of the developers of CloudStack don=92t use it as a user. If we do= gfood, we make try to make it more user friendly and improve its UX over ti= me. --_000_A3BE02194D4A449B914DB9287AB5E582stratosecco_--