Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F3791118E for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39101 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2014 21:41:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 39044 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2014 21:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 39027 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2014 21:41:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:41:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.172] (HELO mail-pd0-f172.google.com) (209.85.192.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:41:29 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y10so2065221pdj.31 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:41:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R+5RH8gM51K7cGurjBivP+5eTCWV8X1PPYzLEM3OedU=; b=exRBLLoh1aIdvh7shE2AIGZVzAak5ujFij8+IwRgowOqBGu2GobUsBUSLMhPvIrMmA BTPT14dpgRunhz0vWvwlJovglzK8knFaNQUpcWr98LYdJdE6FhStEL8eVVnNXJ1eKCvs r6dyhn58TbWpGbM3o7Ozync/ZBUnyRmoMketqazqfgEbHotBCGKI5J0+izWnbCAmC5VY eOJagg61SkQVXg71ttDLWNYYpnHf3i8rGVT7LlG4nIgC+PCF1+ZPXq6cGaxIODJq/j4G Zi64IDpMCYsv/fHZLBzAlsV0eMqFgmzcjzUOVuQqhET200tIoMP9JmUUJ6NNzvOeIBUr DfJg== X-Received: by 10.66.124.136 with SMTP id mi8mr13130482pab.89.1411249268492; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (dev1.cloudsand.com. [162.243.147.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qc3sm5375472pab.48.2014.09.20.14.41.07 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <541DF472.2030906@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:41:06 -0700 From: ilya musayev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS431] upgrade require systemvm upgrade? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Personal experience, i've used latest 4.3.1 and older 4.3.0 sysvm template, with no issues. I'm running vSphere setup. To be on the safe side, look through all commits between 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 and see if any patch references systemvm. On 9/20/14, 8:14 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > does 4.3.1 require different system vm then 4.3.0 ? > > if someone upgrade from 4.x.x 4.3.1 can he use latest 4.3.0 system vm ? > > > *Pierre-Luc DION* > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect > t 855.652.5683 > > *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ >