Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of creategui@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: carlos@reategui.com
In-Reply-To: <8A29C28A-47A6-4C4C-8D3A-5432F8CC6ED7@citrix.com>
References: <326C30D3-BA41-4BD2-967A-D4C4F6241884@citrix.com>
	<CAPpf5a1ZZVRnpMKW5f+=7yx5VaS5mUM1R7La5L6fZwM41YBQJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<8A29C28A-47A6-4C4C-8D3A-5432F8CC6ED7@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:20:01 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAMbNGRVpEW9W-Yoa8+M-z9gT2zJZayGXE7Xd0XPMX+va+=Q9uA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Changes to server.xml to support tomcat7
From: Carlos Reategui <creategui@gmail.com>
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd093af2b5c205009af31d

--047d7bfd093af2b5c205009af31d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Isn't Jetty used for testing?  Why not use it for deployment too and get
rid of tomcat.


On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Damoder Reddy <Damoder.Reddy@citrix.com>
wrote:

>
> On 14-Aug-2014, at 1:57 pm, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> >> Anybody else see any issues if we comment out the 1st section above with
> >> respect to "tomcat6/tomcat7"?
> >>
> >>
> > once we move to tomcat7, this file would no longer be relevant for
> tomcat6
> > right?
>
> Yes that is correct..
>
> >
> > ~Rajani
>
>

--047d7bfd093af2b5c205009af31d--