cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
Date Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:41:37 GMT
Rohit,

I don't see your count. At least Wido and I have voted +1 so that would be
+2 from the PMC. But the vote is a communitee vote. It is about techinique
not process is it. If not then non binding votes are merely for information
and only PMC votes are counted.

In cases like these I think either full concensus or anarchy are the only
options.

I must say that I am very dissappointed by the idea that we must have a
full solution according to some instead of taking steps towards it. This
wouold have been a good step. I for one will not tolerate a -forward thread
anymore for any release I am responsible for. It has cost me to much time
in searching for the source of conflicts. Anarchy from my side until we
find some consensus!

regards,


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for participating. After 120 hours or 5 days, the voting result for
> the proposal is as follows:
>
> +1 (PMC / binding)
> none
>
> +1 (non binding)
> 6 people
>
> 0
> none
>
> -1 (PMC / binding)
> 1 person
>
> -1 (non binding)
> 3 people
>
> We don’t have a consensus/majority or a veto as per our bylaws; and the
> negative voters did not try to explain the deficiencies and raise issues in
> proposed agenda but their concerns were around valid broader issues of gate
> keeping, code quality and CI, and the common argument was to address those
> issues first.
>
> My personal opinion is that adopting the proposed changes will not change,
> affect or conflict with a CI/code quality solution that the community needs
> and will adopt in future. That said, it will be only peaceful and agreeable
> to re-propose the voting agenda again in future and get community consensus.
>
> I would also welcome our PMC’s advise on this situation.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +41 779015219 | rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>



-- 
Daan

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message