cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Duffy <...@ianduffy.ie>
Subject Re: [VOTE] git workflow
Date Fri, 01 Aug 2014 07:09:17 GMT
+1
On 31 Jul 2014 21:33, "Alena Prokharchyk" <Alena.Prokharchyk@citrix.com>
wrote:

> +1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree on
> all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just
> blindly follow http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/,
> plus some use cases are not explained there as I¹ve pointed in one of my
> previous emails.
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 7/31/14, 4:19 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >Hugo, I think we started this voting thread to get opinion on the
> >proposal. I feel it may need some iteration and community agreement
> >before we adopt it.
> >
> >Suggestions, flames and opinions are welcome.
> >
> >Regards.
> >
> >
> >On 31-Jul-2014, at 12:43 pm, Hugo Trippaers <hugo@trippaers.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> Rajani,
> >>
> >> To make it clear for everyone. This is the vote to adopt this new way
> >>of working right? Or is it just to get an opinion on the proposal?
> >>
> >> If it is indeed the vote to adopt this way of working it means that all
> >>committers will change how we interact with the branches in the
> >>CloudStack git.
> >>
> >> It¹s is a good thing in my book, but we need to be clear what the
> >>expected result is when this vote has concluded in 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Hugo
> >>
> >>
> >> On 31 jul. 2014, at 12:28, Rajani Karuturi <Rajani.Karuturi@citrix.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> We had long discussions on the git flow.
> >>> I tried to capture the summary of it @
> >>>http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj
> >>> This is updated on wiki @
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedG
> >>>itflowbasedCheck-inProcess and is up for a vote:
> >>>
> >>> Can you share your opinion on the proposal?
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1  approve
> >>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> ~Rajani
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >Regards,
> >Rohit Yadav
> >Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> >M. +41 779015219 | rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> >Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> >
> >IaaS Cloud Design &
> >Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> >CSForge ­ rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> >CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> >CloudStack Infrastructure
> >Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> >CloudStack Bootcamp Training
> >Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >
> >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> >solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> >or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> >necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If
> >you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take
> >any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> >contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> >Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
> >Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated
> >under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is
> >a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
> >Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of
> >South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue
> >is a registered trademark.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message