cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hugo Trippaers <h...@trippaers.nl>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] git commit proces
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:26:03 GMT
Agreed,  this kind of important decisions should be made by a vote.

Sebastien, Daan, can one of you kick of the vote thread? Preferably with a condensed summary
of the thread?

Cheers,

Hugo


On 28 jul. 2014, at 14:07, Ian Duffy <ian@ianduffy.ie> wrote:

> +1 to what Erik said.
> 
> 
> On 28 July 2014 13:04, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> H,
>>> 
>>> I see a lot of commits happening directly on the master branch. Yet
>>> there were no counter arguments against the proposed gitflow and the
>>> discussion around it. This leaves me with the idea that the thread is
>>> largely ignored by the community. It is my understanding that we
>>> agreed never to commit anything to master anymore that hasn't been
>>> first committed to a branch and is merged back to master (instead of
>>> cherry-picked). What mistake in thinking am I making here?
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Not familiar with bylaws and the such, but wouldn't a change like this
>> require some sort of voting and potentially a more formal information?
>> 
>> Requiring everyone to read through a 50+ replies mail thread and comprehend
>> it could be a bit much.
>> 
>> I would suggest an updated document that explain the expected workflow.
>> 
>> --
>> Erik
>> 


Mime
View raw message