cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*
Date Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:45:40 GMT
Sebastien, this is not about git. And the last RC did not get any
vote. It got one problem reported which turned out to be a user error.
I repeat: No vote at all.

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1 on abandoning 4.4
>
> If you are not getting VOTEs, ping the private@ and ask PMCs to vote, you only need 3
pmc vote to release.
>
> I am inundating by emails and did not even see the new VOTE thread, I left it as the
last VOTE that got -1 within 24 hours.
>
>
> As to why this is happening, I expressed my thoughts in a thread about git flow. Folks
don't seem to be interested.
>
> Test no test, ci no ci, coverity no coverity, if we don't fix our git flow we will never
release on-time.
>
> -sebastien
>
>
>
> On Jul 22, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Donal Lafferty <donal.lafferty@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> It might help to ask what's stopping people from voting.
>>
>> It would seem the correct approach is to only vote for an RC if you've been part
of the QA process either formally by having overseen the build validation infrastructure or
informally by having installed the RC and run some tests.
>>
>> Perhaps this is too difficult.
>>
>> DL
>>
>> PS.  Tempted to flame?  See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham's_Law
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 22 July 2014 10:15
>>> To: dev
>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 07/22/2014 08:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon
>>>>> releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So this is not a good thing. Honestly, yes, I didn't vote, I'm truly
>>>> sorry for that, but didn't I see other votes come along?
>>> This was not a personal attack on you or anybody. I must apologize for
>>> sending it.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>> I saw a vote being abandoned due to a bad quorum, right?
>>> yes, that is the source for my sarcasm. I felt sorry as I sent it. the reason
of
>>> my frustration is a very bad sign though.
>>>
>>> I have been thinking if this is a +1/0/-1 on my job as RM and I don't know. I
do
>>> know that I wouldn't have minded a -1 as much as not knowing.
>>>
>>> I will not abandon this work just yet but I have to threaten you all that I this
is
>>> the way to make me contemplate so.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daan
>



-- 
Daan

Mime
View raw message