cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Duffy <...@ianduffy.ie>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] git commit proces
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:07:17 GMT
+1 to what Erik said.


On 28 July 2014 13:04, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > H,
> >
> > I see a lot of commits happening directly on the master branch. Yet
> > there were no counter arguments against the proposed gitflow and the
> > discussion around it. This leaves me with the idea that the thread is
> > largely ignored by the community. It is my understanding that we
> > agreed never to commit anything to master anymore that hasn't been
> > first committed to a branch and is merged back to master (instead of
> > cherry-picked). What mistake in thinking am I making here?
> >
> >
>
> Not familiar with bylaws and the such, but wouldn't a change like this
> require some sort of voting and potentially a more formal information?
>
> Requiring everyone to read through a 50+ replies mail thread and comprehend
> it could be a bit much.
>
> I would suggest an updated document that explain the expected workflow.
>
> --
> Erik
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message