cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] git workflow
Date Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:59:17 GMT
+1

PL


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Rajani Karuturi <Rajani.Karuturi@citrix.com
> wrote:

> Hi Hugo,
>
> Its mainly to get an opinion on the proposal.
> I am expecting all the active committers to take a look at it and raise
> any concerns they have.
>
> If we don’t get any -1’s or edits, we should start on it.
> Post voting, if its approved, we should do the required git branch changes
> as suggested in the proposal and all the new checkins are expected to
> follow the new commit flow for 4.5+.
>
> if its not approved, we are either happy with the existing flow or we will
> have some good suggestions with which we may need to start a vote again.
>
>
> ~Rajani
>
>
>
> On 31-Jul-2014, at 4:13 pm, Hugo Trippaers <hugo@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>
> > Rajani,
> >
> > To make it clear for everyone. This is the vote to adopt this new way of
> working right? Or is it just to get an opinion on the proposal?
> >
> > If it is indeed the vote to adopt this way of working it means that all
> committers will change how we interact with the branches in the CloudStack
> git.
> >
> > It’s is a good thing in my book, but we need to be clear what the
> expected result is when this vote has concluded in 72 hours.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Hugo
> >
> >
> > On 31 jul. 2014, at 12:28, Rajani Karuturi <Rajani.Karuturi@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We had long discussions on the git flow.
> >> I tried to capture the summary of it @
> http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj
> >> This is updated on wiki @
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess
> and is up for a vote:
> >>
> >> Can you share your opinion on the proposal?
> >>
> >> [ ] +1  approve
> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> ~Rajani
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message