Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of daan.hoogland@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALFpzo4Qe83C98Bsvc7-8ZUMJ053OzF_nrKTTw4rCevwLXEg5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <be6cbb81a1650c42f92c53b1e864f6f9@li.nux.ro>
	<CALFpzo7sh9oDa-PeBh59r+aNyD-QUhP-as4=sO5fkksjeFSWzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9421c85434d18f2196f65b1c5715c5e8@li.nux.ro>
	<CALFpzo4Qe83C98Bsvc7-8ZUMJ053OzF_nrKTTw4rCevwLXEg5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:10:28 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGQtxvbX5eoqFwiPY5fThZ-9xQjCMRMqMmSo+bioGK4m54Em=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Spectacular networking fail with KVM Adv zone - can someone
 address this bug?
From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305b0c8e74103604faf41a74

--20cf305b0c8e74103604faf41a74
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

H Marcus, saw your comment on the patch. I refused it as well and commented
'use BroadcastDomainType to do this' . I think Nux can use the dB update as
well.
On 3 Jun 2014 18:46, "Marcus" <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good catch. This patch works around the main problem that the mgmt server
> is passing broadcastUri in one way (e.g. vlan://100 in his example) for one
> Command and broadcastUri in another way (just '100') for a different
> Command. It doesn't affect fresh 4.3 installs because the way new values
> are stored in the DB make the code always pass 'vlan://100'. Daan and I are
> still discussing how to fix these.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>
> > On 03.06.2014 16:20, Marcus wrote:
> >
> >> I think a fresh 4.3 install with vlan isolation is pretty well tested,
> but
> >> there have been issues with upgrades, and apparently basic/no isolation
> >> networks. I'm taking a shot in the dark to try to help, and I'll see if
> I
> >> can reproduce, but the symptoms seem rather complex and varied. If I can
> >> reproduce it, I can fix it.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Marcus! I have 2 deployments, both fresh 4.3, one Adv and one
> > Adv+SG, neither exhibit this problem, so indeed it does look like an
> > upgrade issue.
> > It looks like someone attempted a fix, but without too much success
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/21908/ ..
> >
> > Lucian
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> >
>

--20cf305b0c8e74103604faf41a74--