Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 483E1110DA for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94943 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2014 18:25:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 94850 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2014 18:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 94768 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2014 18:25:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:25:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-we0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:25:24 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u56so1767580wes.7 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:25:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2ieWm5rd7P2pcxJYmTGV1cPrLGLPjQgRKJxU70TVOzg=; b=NT4+cLNgxL88A2KFjLwQD8iPwcVG4ljNu6yZjaFuUNr4NEHoJzkSQ+WgH6nijUt8vG lxXCQGY9CUt0qoHHsWvmPf4NkvbF/0jARVZ9dqCdRyslR7KuI/zRB1L7Vm5VQw4riQbv rAk/twZIyI03FY0x/5FH7Ti0gy+7gWDc+XlKzTnNjg4/8Z6i4JoRxp/KXRmF939QEaj9 ZtYtpWNVLxAtg87tPunA9dtZnZNAFR3Gpp+b0G1oq5E0KNNjt888BFFR5OfpMxlqFseL 0LUnzZN03BFmYAa8ujMtnBWw50ENtzinC4oc1AiHYwh2NzE+V+ZGJQblxnaILUHxjC0z ZwAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmIWk7LuzxMkPyGKChWj4T7o6hmyx0L54Yyr+WytQfevLBzzGgzBbUOuPF2/7ulh5Re7EEy MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.38.38 with SMTP id d6mr31483663wik.12.1402338300733; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.187.72 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:25:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [207.47.50.254] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:25:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs From: Sheng Yang To: Daan Hoogland Cc: dev , Karl Harris , Alena Prokharchyk , kishan@cloud.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f6469454541ca04fb6b545d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f6469454541ca04fb6b545d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, I am in Pacific Time. --Sheng On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, I think your on pacific time, are you? > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > > I would be glad to join. > > > > --Sheng > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Daan Hoogland > > wrote: > >> > >> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > >> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > >> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > >> > >> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > >> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > >> ascension so tuesday is our intention. > >> > >> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > >> -- > >> Daan > > > > > > > > -- > Daan > --e89a8f6469454541ca04fb6b545d--