cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1
Date Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:20:52 GMT
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding 5e80e5d33d9a295b91cdba9377f52d9d963d802a, we should probably do
> that for IpAssocCommand as well.


I am feeling like in a spiral down. If the user input is fixed up
coming in it should probably be fixed down going out. when we save a
uri in the db we could still present the user with an id. Not when the
id can actually be an non vlan uri, however. This is going to take a
lot of work to get right. I doubt ipAssocCommand is going to be the
last one.

-- 
Daan

Mime
View raw message