cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
Date Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:06:53 GMT
I saw you mentioning mid august as well so there is some confusion


Animesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 1:52 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
> 
> No certainly not, that would mean yet another bigger release and another
> extra shift. It is now at 19 July And I was proposing to move it forward to
> last 19th of june.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:45 AM
> >> To: dev
> >> Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
> >>
> >> Seeing what objections there might be I want to amend my proposal to
> >>
> >> 1. move forward feature freeze not on the coming but on the next
> release.
> >
> >
> > [Animesh] Daan to be clear you are proposing to keep the feature
> > freeze date at Aug 19th
> >
> >
> >> 2. set feature proposal dealine for the coming release on 19th of
> >> June
> >>
> >> flames? other thoughts?
> >> Daan
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ritu Sabharwal
> >> <rsabharw@brocade.com> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Daan for the clarification!
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 1:56 PM
> >> > To: dev
> >> > Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
> >> >
> >> > What I mean is that to prevent the date of oct '14 moving we need
> >> > to
> >> move the feature freeze forward. so we have more time to create the
> >> release.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Ritu Sabharwal
> >> <rsabharw@brocade.com> wrote:
> >> >> When  you say release schedule shift, does it mean 4.5 release
> >> >> target is
> >> moved from Oct '14 to a forward date?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks & Regards,
> >> >> Ritu S.
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> >> >> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:26 AM
> >> >> To: dev
> >> >> Subject: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
> >> >>
> >> >> LS,
> >> >>
> >> >> When I seeing once again our release schedule shift, I think we
> >> >> have no
> >> option but to move feature freeze for the next release forward.
> >> >> This is the only way it seems we can reduce the complexity of the
> >> >> total
> >> sum of changes. Therefore it is the only way we can prevent lapsing
> >> even more in time without risking reduced quality of our next release.
> >> >> So I propose to move feature freeze forward by a month to be at
> >> >> the
> >> 19th of June (instead of July). I don't think we need to strictly
> >> move code freeze forward as well but vigilance onto added features will
> be necessary.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Daan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Daan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Daan
Mime
View raw message