cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Reátegui <create...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: building and testing 4.4.
Date Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:53:21 GMT

On Jun 20, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Rohit Yadav <bhaisaab@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Carlos Reátegui <creategui@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Rohit,
>> 
>> On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Rohit Yadav <bhaisaab@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Carlos Reategui <carlos@reategui.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>> Thanks for the info, but I was asking about the non-oss.  Is that
>> included
>>>> in Wido's released versions?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> This is oss (I checked the 4.3 release debs, and could not find vmware
>> jars
>>> and other non-oss stuff).
>>> 
>> Thanks for checking... I guess I could have done that.
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I'm assuming the zip file you linked below will give me the same as:
>>>> git checkout remotes/origin/4.4
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yes :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Also, what is the issue with tomcat 6.0.35?  I just noticed that my
>>>> Management Server is running the default Ubuntu tomcat6 which is 6.0.35.
>>>> Are all versions of CloudStack affected?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Historically we've been using 6.0.33, we need to revisit it. For now I
>>> would recommend you to use Tomcat 6.0.33.
>> How do you recommend dealing with the tomcat6 dependency check in the
>> cloudstack install? I found 6.0.32 debs here:
>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/amd64/tomcat6/6.0.32-5ubuntu1 would
>> those be ok?  Should I build my own? I am assuming these instructions
>> should work for ubuntu:
>> http://plone.uconn.edu/workspaces/uits-linux/standard-operating-procedures-sop/packaging-tomcat-6-for-debian
> 
> 
> I think 6.0.32 would work. I build from source and run using maven so I
> don't use debian/rpms builds myself, whether using 6.0.35 or 6.0.32 from
> default repo will work (it may); just try them both, the worst case would
> be that it will fail after which you can try building your own.
I have been running 4.1.1 since last year on 6.0.35 without any issues that I can tell.  I
tried searching for the issues with .35 but can’t find anything concrete.  The build docs
just say there is a known issue but don’t specify what that is.  Anyone know what this known
issue is?

I see this as a bigger documentation/installation problem as the install docs don’t mention
how to get around this dependency.  If you just follow the instructions you end up with .35
on ubuntu 12.04.

> 
> Any debian user/sysadmin want to comment here?
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks for filing the doc bug.
>> No prob.  I wold have made the changes myself but wasn't sure what the
>> preferred solution for the above dependency should be.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>>> 
>> <snip>


Mime
View raw message