cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1
Date Fri, 30 May 2014 16:26:28 GMT
But you added the 'toUri' code.



On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
wrote:

> BroadcastDomainType.Vlan.
> toUri(Vlan.UNTAGGED).toString() should return 'untagged' in my opinion
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The issue is that we put this in the map:
> >
> >
> broadcastUriToNicNum.put(BroadcastDomainType.Vlan.toUri(Vlan.UNTAGGED).toString(),
> > devNum);
> >
> > Which is 'vlan://untagged', and we fetch the eth devNum back by doing:
> >
> > broadcastUriToNicNum.get(ip.getBroadcastUri());
> >
> > which is just 'untagged'
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It's not valid if you've got code that says does string
> 'vlan://untagged'
> >> equal 'untagged'.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> CLOUDSTACK-5505 looks alright. As for the solution; Isn't 'untagged' a
> >>> valid uri in itself? I would expect it would have always the value
> >>> without the 'vlan://'. That said a solution is better then no
> >>> solution, maybe the db upgrade path is best.
> >>>
> >>> Andrija, can you try as Marcus suggests, editing the db to change
> >>> 'untagged' to 'vlan://untagged'?
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> Daan
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > If that works, then I think the fix is better to update the database
> >>> > upgrade script to look for this and change the vlan_id. That way new
> >>> > installs and upgrades have consistent data. We could fix it in the
> code
> >>> by
> >>> > filtering it through
> >>> BroadcastDomainType.Vlan.toUri(ipAddr.getVlanTag()),
> >>> > but then later when someone expects the vlan id to be in URI format
> >>> > somewhere else it will randomly break on people who did an upgrade.
> The
> >>> fix
> >>> > to CLOUDSTACK-5505 did this, avoiding the mismatch in format in the
> DB
> >>> by
> >>> > fetching the data from elsewhere that filtered it into URI format,
> and
> >>> then
> >>> > we just ended up hitting it again here.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Actually, if you're in the position to play a bit...  New
> deployments
> >>> seem
> >>> >> to work, and I believe it's because that broadcastUri is stored in
> the
> >>> db
> >>> >> in the new format:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> mysql> select id,vlan_id from vlan where network_id = (select id
> from
> >>> >> networks where traffic_type="Public");
> >>> >> +----+-----------------+
> >>> >> | id | vlan_id         |
> >>> >> +----+-----------------+
> >>> >> |  1 | vlan://untagged |
> >>> >> +----+-----------------+
> >>> >> 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I believe 4.2 and earlier would say just 'untagged' there. If you
> want
> >>> to
> >>> >> attempt changing that value to include vlan:// (if it is in fact
> >>> missing),
> >>> >> then restarting everything, that may fix the  issue.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> I thinnk the commit that caused the change was this or related to
> it.
> >>> Is
> >>> >>> there any way you could test a fix? Do you need me to build 4.3
> RPMs
> >>> or can
> >>> >>> I just provide a patch? What works for you?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> commit 53d09c6f1843f04c5f1ab76be9419f5584302d1e
> >>> >>> Date:   Mon Aug 5 11:52:40 2013 +0200
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>     uri code per broadcast/isolation type , default is to accept
> >>> anything
> >>> >>> as uri , vlan and lswitch need some extra tlc
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Note the differences in broadcastUri, here is your plug command:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> {
> >>> >>>>     "com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand": {
> >>> >>>>         "nic": {
> >>> >>>>             "deviceId": 1,
> >>> >>>>             "networkRateMbps": 99999,
> >>> >>>>             "defaultNic": true,
> >>> >>>>             "uuid": "6c782af3-2071-4543-acdc-cb30096e89ff",
> >>> >>>>             "ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
> >>> >>>>             "netmask": "255.255.255.0",
> >>> >>>>             "gateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
> >>> >>>>             "mac": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
> >>> >>>>             "broadcastType": "Vlan",
> >>> >>>>             "type": "Public",
> >>> >>>>             "broadcastUri": "vlan://untagged",
> >>> >>>>             "isolationUri": "vlan://untagged",
> >>> >>>>             "isSecurityGroupEnabled": false,
> >>> >>>>             "name": "breth1-500"
> >>> >>>>         },
> >>> >>>>         "instanceName": "r-801-VM",
> >>> >>>>         "vmType": "DomainRouter",
> >>> >>>>         "wait": 0
> >>> >>>>     }
> >>> >>>> }
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> and here is your ip associate command:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> {
> >>> >>>>     "com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand": {
> >>> >>>>         "ipAddresses": [
> >>> >>>>             {
> >>> >>>>                 "accountId": 11,
> >>> >>>>                 "publicIp": "46.232.xxx.246",
> >>> >>>>                 "sourceNat": true,
> >>> >>>>                 "add": true,
> >>> >>>>                 "oneToOneNat": false,
> >>> >>>>                 "firstIP": false,
> >>> >>>>                 "broadcastUri": "untagged",
> >>> >>>>                 "vlanGateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
> >>> >>>>                 "vlanNetmask": "255.255.255.0",
> >>> >>>>                 "vifMacAddress": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
> >>> >>>>                 "networkRate": 99999,
> >>> >>>>                  "trafficType": "Public",
> >>> >>>>                 "networkName": "breth1-500"
> >>> >>>>             }
> >>> >>>>         ],
> >>> >>>>         "accessDetails": {
> >>> >>>>             "router.guest.ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
> >>> >>>>             "zone.network.type": "Advanced",
> >>> >>>>             "router.name": "r-801-VM",
> >>> >>>>             "router.ip": "169.254.0.52"
> >>> >>>>         },
> >>> >>>>         "wait": 0
> >>> >>>>     }
> >>> >>>> }
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrija Panic <
> >>> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> yes, correct, eth1 is present, and can be started by static IP
> >>> >>>>> configuration...
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> On 30 May 2014 17:25, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> > Let me make sure I understand... the 'Plug' of the nic works
> >>> fine, as
> >>> >>>>> it
> >>> >>>>> > seems you do have an eth1 and can manually assign the IP to get
> >>> it to
> >>> >>>>> work?
> >>> >>>>> > If that's the case then there's probably not an issue in
> >>> >>>>> BridgeVifDriver or
> >>> >>>>> > the XML. It is definitely in fetching/matching the eth device
> here
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52  -A  -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull
> -g
> >>> >>>>> > 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andrija Panic <
> >>> >>>>> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > > Nope, started, did check, it is reported now as Debian 5 VM,
> but
> >>> >>>>> still
> >>> >>>>> > > doesn't work...
> >>> >>>>> > > Rebooted VPC (destroyed VR, new one created...)
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > > $ virsh dumpxml r-812-VM
> >>> >>>>> > >  ...
> >>> >>>>> > > <description>Debian GNU/Linux 5(64-bit)</description>
> >>> >>>>> > > ...
> >>> >>>>> > > <os>
> >>> >>>>> > >     <type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'>hvm</type>
> >>> >>>>> > >     <boot dev='cdrom'/>
> >>> >>>>> > >     <boot dev='hd'/>
> >>> >>>>> > >   </os>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > > :(
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > > On 30 May 2014 16:24, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com
> >
> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > > > I confirm, the highest is Debian 5 64bit
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > > Per docs
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-2-x-to-4-3
> >>> >>>>> > > > , you should use Debian 7.0 64bit as OS type for
> >>> system-kvm-4.3
> >>> >>>>> > > template...
> >>> >>>>> > > > (same for xen and vmware templatest)
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > > Will change now DB to point to debian 5, and let you know.
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > > This is guest_os_id:          184 |           2 | NULL |
> >>> >>>>> > > > 986a0e98-39d6-11e3-8f93-0025904e4412 | Debian GNU/Linux
> >>> 7(64-bit)
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > > On 30 May 2014 15:45, Joris van Lieshout <
> >>> >>>>> > > JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > > wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> Andrija,
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM
> works.
> >>> >>>>> There must
> >>> >>>>> > > be
> >>> >>>>> > > >> a way to list supported os types.
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table
> (ACS
> >>> >>>>> 4.3)
> >>> >>>>> > and I
> >>> >>>>> > > >> don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed.
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on
> >>> >>>>> > > >> guest_os.id=guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_id where
> >>> >>>>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.hypervisor_type='KVM' and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_name like '%Debian%';
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> What was the guest_os_id you where using? Could you try
> id 72
> >>> >>>>> (Debian
> >>> >>>>> > 5
> >>> >>>>> > > >> 64-bit)? Adjust both os_type_id in vm_instance and
> >>> vm_template
> >>> >>>>> (where
> >>> >>>>> > > >> type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM').
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> Kind regards,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> Schuberg Philis
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> On 30/05/14 15:33, "Andrija Panic" <
> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >Joris,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ?
> I'm
> >>> >>>>> not sure
> >>> >>>>> > > how
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3
> >>> template
> >>> >>>>> to
> >>> >>>>> > > define
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >it
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >as another OS type... ?
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >Thanks again,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >Andrija
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout <
> >>> >>>>> > > >> JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at
> >>> >>>>> > > >> BridgeVifDriver.java
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> (this is where the log message with the nic profile is
> >>> >>>>> generated)
> >>> >>>>> > you
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>can
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> see that the nic information might be off already once
> ACS
> >>> >>>>> hits the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be
> to
> >>> >>>>> believer
> >>> >>>>> > > that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> the HVM/PV OS mismatch issue might still be related.
> Try
> >>> >>>>> fixing
> >>> >>>>> > that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from
> the
> >>> >>>>> list.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> Kind regards,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> Schuberg Philis
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> On 30/05/14 15:26, "Andrija Panic" <
> >>> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >OK, thanks Joris.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >I will try playing with OS version option, on the
> >>> >>>>> systemvm-kvm-4.3
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >template...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >Let me know if I can help with anything more.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >Thanks.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >Andrija
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >><JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM
> >>> you
> >>> >>>>> can see
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>"<type
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know
> >>> >>>>> KVM+ACS
> >>> >>>>> > well
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>enough
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing
> on
> >>> >>>>> getting
> >>> >>>>> > the
> >>> >>>>> > > VR
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the
> other
> >>> >>>>> hand I
> >>> >>>>> > do
> >>> >>>>> > > >> see
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into
> >>> java
> >>> >>>>> code,
> >>> >>>>> > is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>this:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG
> [cloud.agent.Agent]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>(agentRequest-Handler-3:)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> Executing:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> >
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52  -A  -l 46.232.xxx.246
> -c
> >>> >>>>> ethnull -g
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation
> from
> >>> the
> >>> >>>>> nic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>profile
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find
> >>> the
> >>> >>>>> nic id
> >>> >>>>> > > and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> returns null.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but
> >>> this is
> >>> >>>>> > where
> >>> >>>>> > > we
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>might
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> need some help from someone with knowledge of this
> >>> pice of
> >>> >>>>> the
> >>> >>>>> > > code.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>:)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> Kind regards,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <
> >>> >>>>> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on
> >>> cs1.xxx/net
> >>> >>>>> host:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >So, management logs again:
> >>> http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >Agent logs on cs1.xxx:
> http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >Not playing smart, but there is some error:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of
> >>> guest
> >>> >>>>> os:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> Debian
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >Best,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >><JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev
> >>> list. :)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> But u might need a bit more info.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> At a certain point I see this line
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
> >>> >>>>> 1-609104082:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>Sending
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> {
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net
> ),
> >>> >>>>> Ver: v1,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> Flags:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>100111,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>".
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>..
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> This is where the information is passed on to the
> >>> agent
> >>> >>>>> > > handles.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>For
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>XS
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> this would initiate an agent handler on the
> >>> management
> >>> >>>>> server
> >>> >>>>> > > but
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>for
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>KVM,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on
> >>> to the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>cloudstack
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>agent
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> service on the hypervisor.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM
> >>> >>>>> hypervisor
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>executing
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then
> >>> >>>>> search top
> >>> >>>>> > > down
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>for
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the
> log
> >>> >>>>> from the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>agent
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> handler thread started by that sequence.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <
> >>> >>>>> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >here is the management log:
> >>> >>>>> http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>[o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af)
> >>> copyAsync
> >>> >>>>> > > inspecting
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>src
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>type
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
> >>> >>>>> > 4-1248669612:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>Sending
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>{
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(
> cs2.xxxxx.net),
> >>> >>>>> Ver: v1,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>Flags:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 100011,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>.a
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>pa
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>ch
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>f-
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>b0
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>b4
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>t
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"Q
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>CO
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>W2
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>",
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff","
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >*hvm":true*
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.clou
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>ds
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>ta
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>ck
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-220
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>3f
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>79
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>b1
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
> >>> >>>>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>8
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorT
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>yp
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>e"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>:"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>"u
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>ui
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>d"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataSto
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>re
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>":
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>{"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b9342
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>2e
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>-1
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>a6
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
> >>> >>>>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>8
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":10
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>64
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>,"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>vm
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>0,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>"h
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>yp
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612:
> >>> >>>>> Processing:
> >>> >>>>> > >  {
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>Ans: ,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags:
> 10,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>"o
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>rg
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>.a
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>":
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>"9
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>c4
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>:0
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>}}
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>,"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >result":true,"wait":0}}]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
> >>> >>>>> > 4-1248669612:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>Received:  {
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1,
> >>> Flags:
> >>> >>>>> 10, {
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>CopyCmdAnswer
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >} }
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af)
> >>> Removing
> >>> >>>>> nic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>NicProfile[
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged
> of
> >>> type
> >>> >>>>> > Public
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>from
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >nics
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged
> later
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af)
> >>> Removing
> >>> >>>>> nic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vl
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >4
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start.
> The
> >>> >>>>> nic will
> >>> >>>>> > > be
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af)
> >>> Removing
> >>> >>>>> nic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vl
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >3
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start.
> The
> >>> >>>>> nic will
> >>> >>>>> > > be
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af)
> >>> Removing
> >>> >>>>> nic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start.
> The
> >>> >>>>> nic will
> >>> >>>>> > > be
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af)
> >>> Removing
> >>> >>>>> nic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >><JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <
> >>> >>>>> > andrija.panic@gmail.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the
> log
> >>> >>>>> from the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>moment
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>I
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>reboot
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then
> start
> >>> >>>>> capturing
> >>> >>>>> > > log,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>start it
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors
> >>> inside
> >>> >>>>> VR) ?
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >><JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your
> >>> situation is
> >>> >>>>> > > different
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>so
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>PV/HVM is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> not the issue.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have
> >>> >>>>> provided I
> >>> >>>>> > > noted
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>VR
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting
> for
> >>> >>>>> ethnull to
> >>> >>>>> > > be
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>up.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>This
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>raises
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the question where null was introduced
> >>> instead of
> >>> >>>>> 1.
> >>> >>>>> > The
> >>> >>>>> > > >> ACS
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>management
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think,
> later
> >>> down
> >>> >>>>> the
> >>> >>>>> > > road
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>where
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>ACS
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>gives
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If
> >>> you
> >>> >>>>> would
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>capture
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from
> >>> >>>>> startCommand
> >>> >>>>> > till
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>exception,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull?
> You
> >>> >>>>> might
> >>> >>>>> > need
> >>> >>>>> > > to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>reed
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>into
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to
> >>> find a
> >>> >>>>> clue.
> >>> >>>>> > > The
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>thing
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that I
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> only have experience with XS based
> >>> environment so
> >>> >>>>> I
> >>> >>>>> > > cannot
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>point
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>you
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at
> >>> least, it
> >>> >>>>> is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>(DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>Created a
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43
> on 1"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <
> >>> >>>>> > > >> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Deen,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with
> value
> >>> >>>>> > > "untagged" -
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui,
> and
> >>> is
> >>> >>>>> used
> >>> >>>>> > in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> API
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>call
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>(or
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >better
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management
> >>> server
> >>> >>>>> > logs).
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Best,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >><daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net
> vlan://500
> >>> You
> >>> >>>>> have
> >>> >>>>> > > one
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>like
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using
> the
> >>> same
> >>> >>>>> > vlan. I
> >>> >>>>> > > >> am
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>wondering
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as
> >>> 'vlan://untagged'.
> >>> >>>>> I
> >>> >>>>> > think
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string
> >>> 'vlan://untagged'
> >>> >>>>> in
> >>> >>>>> > your
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>db?
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM,
> Andrija
> >>> Panic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address
> this
> >>> >>>>> issue :)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So...:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2
> patched by
> >>> >>>>> Inktank
> >>> >>>>> > > for
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>CEPH
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>support),
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>OS
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1
> was
> >>> fine
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for
> this
> >>> >>>>> part :)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type
> 184 =
> >>> >>>>> Debian 7
> >>> >>>>> > > x64
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 =
> >>> template
> >>> >>>>> was
> >>> >>>>> > > >> ofcourse
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64
> type... so
> >>> >>>>> this
> >>> >>>>> > > should
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>not
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>be
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>issues
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of
> >>> >>>>> "standard" =
> >>> >>>>> > all
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>SVMs
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>are on
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>CEPH
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering
> >>> database
> >>> >>>>> to
> >>> >>>>> > make
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>some
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>new
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>System
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM
> -
> >>> what
> >>> >>>>> I
> >>> >>>>> > did,
> >>> >>>>> > > I
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>also
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>have
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>done
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>same
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another
> >>> System
> >>> >>>>> > Offering
> >>> >>>>> > > >> as
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>default
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>-
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could
> use
> >>> >>>>> "Change
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>Offering..."
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>button
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>on
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per
> >>> docs...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on
> >>> 4.2.1...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
> the
> >>> >>>>> content
> >>> >>>>> > is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>folowing
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>at
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> moment
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat
> >>> >>>>> /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8
> >>> domain=cscloud.internal
> >>> >>>>> > > >> dns1=8.8.8.8
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> dns2=
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> template=domP
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75
> >>> >>>>> > > eth0mask=255.255.0.0
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>type=vpcrouter
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does
> not
> >>> >>>>> have IP
> >>> >>>>> > > info,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>eth0
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(control
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that
> >>> are
> >>> >>>>> used
> >>> >>>>> > for
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>Tiers
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>get IP
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>info
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> fine.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1
> >>> >>>>> (public NIC)
> >>> >>>>> > > and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>start
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>ifup
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>eth1 -
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP
> Port
> >>> >>>>> > Forwarding
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>etc
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>does
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>not
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>work...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be
> >>> realted to
> >>> >>>>> my
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>"Public"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>network
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing)
> >>> is NOT
> >>> >>>>> > tagged
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does
> work
> >>> >>>>> fine is
> >>> >>>>> > the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> VR
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>used
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>Shared
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from
> >>> Guest
> >>> >>>>> IP
> >>> >>>>> > range
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>(also
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>efectively
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change
> Public
> >>> IP
> >>> >>>>> range
> >>> >>>>> > > from
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>untagged
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this,
> if
> >>> >>>>> there is
> >>> >>>>> > > any
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>way
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>at
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>all
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(editing
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500
> >>> does
> >>> >>>>> not
> >>> >>>>> > work,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>after
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>rebooting
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>VR
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui).
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > :)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected
> >>> date
> >>> >>>>> for
> >>> >>>>> > 4.4,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> but
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>right
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>now,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>I'm
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all
> >>> VPC
> >>> >>>>> not
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>operational at
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>all...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van
> Lieshout
> >>> <
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this
> as
> >>> >>>>> well.
> >>> >>>>> > > Looking
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>at
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>you
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>issue I
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar.
> >>> Back
> >>> >>>>> then
> >>> >>>>> > > when
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>upgrading
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>4.2.1
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out
> own
> >>> >>>>> custom
> >>> >>>>> > build
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>svm
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>template.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before
> >>> >>>>> explaining
> >>> >>>>> > > what
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>cause
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>was
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> our
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> case. :)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are
> you
> >>> >>>>> using?
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a
> >>> para-virtualised
> >>> >>>>> > instance
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>(PV)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>or
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>hardware
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe
> vm-param-list"
> >>> on
> >>> >>>>> the VR
> >>> >>>>> > > >> uuid
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>check
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and
> >>> HVM-boot-policy is
> >>> >>>>> > unset.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in
> ACS
> >>> >>>>> > (guest_os_id
> >>> >>>>> > > >> in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>vm_instance
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>table
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM
> >>> template?
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new
> >>> template
> >>> >>>>> was
> >>> >>>>> > not
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>supported
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>on
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running.
> >>> Therefore
> >>> >>>>> the
> >>> >>>>> > VR
> >>> >>>>> > > >> was
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>started
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>by
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>XS
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>as
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> a
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on
> the
> >>> >>>>> arguments
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>passed
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>them
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest
> in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config)
> in
> >>> >>>>> order to
> >>> >>>>> > > work.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>cmdline
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>contains
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets
> >>> started
> >>> >>>>> as a
> >>> >>>>> > HVM
> >>> >>>>> > > >> it
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>will
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>not
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>get
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's
> >>> NICs.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB
> >>> (yes
> >>> >>>>> I know
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>editing
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>DB
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but
> >>> there
> >>> >>>>> is no
> >>> >>>>> > > >> other
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>way
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>in
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>this
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>case)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the
> >>> >>>>> systemvmtemplate
> >>> >>>>> > to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>something
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>supported
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> by
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic"
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >><andrija.panic@gmail.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1
> physical
> >>> net
> >>> >>>>> (that
> >>> >>>>> > > is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>both
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>tagged
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 500,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over
> same
> >>> KVM
> >>> >>>>> > bridge,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>over
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>to
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> outside
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >world)...
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >><daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one
> >>> >>>>> physical
> >>> >>>>> > net?
> >>> >>>>> > > >> or
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>two
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>physical
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>nets
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems
> wrong).
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM,
> >>> Jayapal
> >>> >>>>> > Reddy
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>Uradi
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table
> will
> >>> >>>>> work.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM,
> Andrija
> >>> >>>>> Panic
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.panic@gmail.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest
> >>> traffic
> >>> >>>>> (vlan
> >>> >>>>> > > 500)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>and
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>the
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>second
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public
> >>> traffic/network
> >>> >>>>> (no
> >>> >>>>> > vlan
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>tags,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>that
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>is
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> untagged
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> packets)
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged
> packets
> >>> >>>>> travel
> >>> >>>>> > over
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>physical
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach
> >>> Internet.
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan
> >>> Hoogland
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >><daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57
> AM,
> >>> >>>>> Andrija
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>Panic <
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your
> >>> guestnetwork
> >>> >>>>> or
> >>> >>>>> > your
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>physical
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>network?
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets
> >>> with
> >>> >>>>> vlan
> >>> >>>>> > > 500!
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >--
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >--
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >--
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >  http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >>
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > > --
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > > > Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > > --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >   http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > > --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > > >
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > > --
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> > > Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> > > --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > >   http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> > > --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> > >
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Andrija Panić
> >>> >>>>> --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>>   http://admintweets.com
> >>> >>>>> --------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Daan
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message