cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joris van Lieshout <JvanLiesh...@schubergphilis.com>
Subject Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1
Date Fri, 30 May 2014 13:19:36 GMT
Hi Andrija,

That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you can see "<type
arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS well enough
to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on getting the VR
started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other hand I do see
patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully...

The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java code, is this:

2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:) nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged]
2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command:
com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
Executing: 
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52  -A  -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g
46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0

My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the nic profile to
the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the nic id and
returns null.

Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is where we might
need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of the code. :)


Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout

Schuberg Philis
Boeingavenue 271
1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
schubergphilis.com

+31 20-7506672
+31 6-51428188




On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.panic@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Joris,
>
>I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net host:
>
>So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
>Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
>
>Not playing smart, but there is some error:
>[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
>(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest os: Debian
>GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>
>Best,
>Andrija
>
>
>On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout <JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrija,
>>
>> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :)
>> But u might need a bit more info.
>>
>> At a certain point I see this line
>>
>> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 1-609104082: Sending  {
>> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1, Flags:
>>100111,
>> 
>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM"...
>>
>>
>> This is where the information is passed on to the agent handles. For XS
>> this would initiate an agent handler on the management server but for
>>KVM,
>> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the cloudstack
>>agent
>> service on the hypervisor.
>>
>> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor executing the
>> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search top down for
>> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log from the agent
>> handler thread started by that sequence.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Joris van Lieshout
>>
>> Schuberg Philis
>> Boeingavenue 271
>> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
>> schubergphilis.com
>>
>> +31 20-7506672
>> +31 6-51428188
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.panic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Joris,
>> >
>> >here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
>> >
>> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold
>> >
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync inspecting src
>>type
>> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612: Sending
>>{
>> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1, Flags:
>> 100011,
>> 
>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apa
>>>ch
>> 
>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0
>>>b4
>> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":"
>> >
>> 
>>http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas
>>t
>> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>> 
>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"QCOW2
>>>",
>> >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff","
>> >*hvm":true*
>> 
>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudsta
>>>ck
>> 
>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-2203f79
>>>b1
>> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>> >
>> 
>>cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>>8
>> >a8-2203f79b1dc6
>> 
>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorType"
>>>:"
>> 
>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uui
>>>d"
>> 
>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":
>>>{"
>> 
>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1
>>>a6
>> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>> >
>> 
>>cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>>8
>> 
>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":1064,"
>>>vm
>> 
>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":0,"h
>>>yp
>> >ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}]
>> >}
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612: Processing:  { Ans: ,
>> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>> 
>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{"org
>>>.a
>> 
>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path":"9
>>>c4
>> 
>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id":0}}
>>>,"
>> >result":true,"wait":0}}]
>> >}
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612:
>>Received:  {
>> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, {
>>CopyCmdAnswer
>> >} }
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic NicProfile[
>> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type Public from the
>> >nics
>> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> 
>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vlan:/
>>>/4
>> >4
>> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged
>> >later
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> 
>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vlan:/
>>>/4
>> >3
>> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged
>> >later
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> 
>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vlan:/
>>>/3
>> >004
>> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged
>> >later
>> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> 
>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vlan:/
>>>/3
>> >004
>> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start
>> >
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >
>> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout
>><JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com
>> >
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >>
>> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards,
>> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >>
>> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> Boeingavenue 271
>> >> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
>> >> schubergphilis.com
>> >>
>> >> +31 20-7506672
>> >> +31 6-51428188
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.panic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi Joris,
>> >> >
>> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from the moment I
>> >>reboot
>> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start capturing log, and
>> >>start it
>> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside VR) ?
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
>> >><JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com
>> >> >
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is different so
>> >>PV/HVM is
>> >> >> not the issue.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided I noted that
>>the
>> >>VR
>> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for ethnull to be up.
>>This
>> >> >>raises
>> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of 1. The ACS
>> >>management
>> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down the road where
>>ACS
>> >> >>gives
>> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you would capture the
>> >> >> job-executor in the management log from startCommand till the
>> >>exception,
>> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might need to reed
>>into
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a clue. The thing
>>is
>> >> >>that I
>> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I cannot point
>>you
>> >>to
>> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it is
>> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e)
>> >>Created a
>> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Kind regards,
>> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.panic@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Hi Deen,
>> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value "untagged" -
that
>> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is used in API
call
>>(or
>> >> >> >better
>> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server logs).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Best,
>> >> >> >Andrija
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Andrija,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You have one
like
>>that
>> >>and
>> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same vlan. I
am
>> >>wondering
>> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I think
that is
>>the
>> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in your
db?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic
>> >> >> >><andrija.panic@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Hi Joris,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this issue :)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > So...:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by Inktank
for CEPH
>> >> >>support),
>> >> >> >>OS
>> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
>> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine
>> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part :)
>> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64
>> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 = Debian 7
x64
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was ofcourse
>> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2
>> >> >> >> -
>> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this should
not be
>>the
>> >> >> >>issues
>> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of "standard" =
all SVMs
>>are on
>> >> >>CEPH
>> >> >> >>-
>> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database to make
some new
>> >> >>System
>> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I did,
I also
>>have
>> >> >>done
>> >> >> >>same
>> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System Offering
as
>>default
>> >>-
>> >> >> >>which
>> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use "Change
>>Offering..."
>> >> >>button
>> >> >> >>on
>> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs...
>> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the content
is folowing
>>at
>> >>the
>> >> >> >> moment
>> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal dns1=8.8.8.8
dns2=
>> >> >> >> template=domP
>> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75 eth0mask=255.255.0.0
>> >> >>type=vpcrouter
>> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have IP
info, eth0
>> >> >>(control
>> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are used for
Tiers
>>get IP
>> >> >>info
>> >> >> >> fine.
>> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public NIC)
and start
>> >>ifup
>> >> >> >>eth1 -
>> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port Forwarding
etc does
>> >>not
>> >> >> >>work...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to my "Public"
>>network
>> >> >>(in
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT tagged
>> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)...
>> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine is
the VR used
>>in
>> >> >>Shared
>> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP range
(also
>> >> >>efectively
>> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP range
from
>>untagged
>> >>to
>> >> >> >>vlan
>> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if there is
any way at
>>all
>> >> >> >>(editing
>> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not work,
after
>> >> >>rebooting
>> >> >> >>VR
>> >> >> >> > from ACS gui).
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > :)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for 4.4,
but right
>> >>now,
>> >> >>I'm
>> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not operational
at
>> >> >>all...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout <
>> >> >> >> JvanLieshout@schubergphilis.com>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well.
Looking at you
>> >> >>issue I
>> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back then
when
>>upgrading
>> >> >>4.2.1
>> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom
build svm
>> >>template.
>> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before explaining
what the
>>cause
>> >> >>was
>> >> >> >>in
>> >> >> >> our
>> >> >> >> >> case. :)
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you using?
>> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised instance
(PV) or
>> >> >>hardware
>> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on the
VR uuid and
>> >>check
>> >> >>that
>> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is unset.
>> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS (guest_os_id
in
>> >>vm_instance
>> >> >> >>table
>> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os)
>> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :)
>> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template was
not
>>supported
>> >>on
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore the
VR was
>>started
>> >>by
>> >> >>XS
>> >> >> >>as
>> >> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the arguments
passed to
>> >>them
>> >> >>in
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in
>>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>> >> >> >>which in
>> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order
to work.
>>cmdline
>> >> >> >>contains
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information.
>> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started as
a HVM it will
>>not
>> >> >>get
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Workaround
>> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I
know editing
>>the
>> >>DB
>> >> >>is
>> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there is
no other way
>>in
>> >>this
>> >> >> >>case)
>> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the systemvmtemplate
to
>>something
>> >> >> >>supported
>> >> >> >> by
>> >> >> >> >> XenServer.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.panic@gmail.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net
(that is both
>> >>tagged
>> >> >>vlan
>> >> >> >> 500,
>> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM
bridge, and over
>> >>eth1
>> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> outside
>> >> >> >> >> >world)...
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
>><daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one physical
net? or two
>> >> >>physical
>> >> >> >>nets
>> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong).
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal
Reddy Uradi
>> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com>
wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table
will work.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija
Panic
>> >> >> >><andrija.panic@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest
traffic (vlan 500) and the
>> >> >>second
>> >> >> >> half is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network
(no vlan tags,
>>that
>> >>is
>> >> >> >> untagged
>> >> >> >> >> >> packets)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets
travel over physical
>> >>eth1
>> >> >> >> >> >>interface on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan
Hoogland
>> >> >><daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at
10:57 AM, Andrija Panic <
>> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.panic@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your
guestnetwork or your physical
>> >> >>network?
>> >> >> >> You
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two
nets with vlan 500!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>  http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >   http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Daan
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >
>> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Andrija Panić
>> >--------------------------------------
>> >  http://admintweets.com
>> >--------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Andrija Panić
>--------------------------------------
>  http://admintweets.com
>--------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message