Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A52B10406 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41003 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2014 02:19:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 40765 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2014 02:19:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 40753 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2014 02:19:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:19:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [74.125.149.147] (HELO na3sys009aog122.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:19:35 +0000 Received: from mail-ve0-f178.google.com ([209.85.128.178]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob122.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKU18MGa/Tj6P4Hlz81Yaj/54ggegG0q07@postini.com; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:19:12 PDT Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id jw12so8988510veb.37 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:19:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=75xwOr+KpMSBnB4XMwtUGhRL5tk2MfmpfXv9ZCuWM0g=; b=Gji8USPOizxBdIZi4XsYLE7EB2WlNCZPNJry29k1g6UvtXL1eXlYpEqm7RNhGLPB2j l/oBJyFlxTyrfflGL2VF/Hr09QF4Oa1dxYSgDdG2cKH0yZ4WP8e9Ncu6RgI9MDQ7+cs9 myJKBNwWTTV+aXoa+R/WfltaAeDewOucQSs69kmYy4SXsgsSiYSQT30rlurWGOFNZmzb 36FG1dc+i4g+CGQ2mXMFwr8AZpw307J5vMnpRkqLSY0WeEamhMaxpNv8/T4LONAj1H30 LEgnGMzsBUcPXBy5K8fdiHUk1oNY5/6LolcI8oIrX5P5fB55tAbyD2eG+V1SiAy0/CFK KmKA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkTgu8mfXfscKEo+DFFWox5d+P5w7zDFl4SbxtcZuEH8Il7+UN1dRRQXI8cU6jYmpuO638rSAmJ5KgAER4ZOWk29N/ajMfHmwrOmZdAtzFJ9rbpeQozDXCr83HO79lX3T22RvUc X-Received: by 10.52.166.102 with SMTP id zf6mr22829464vdb.2.1398737945434; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:19:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.166.102 with SMTP id zf6mr22829458vdb.2.1398737945310; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.53.7.3 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:49:05 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: [Reminder]:- Re: Review Request 20007: CLOUDSTACK-2697 - Populated the clusterId with actual value instead of Null in the alert message logs From: Girish Chaudhari To: prashant mishra Cc: cloudstack , Girish Chaudhari Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c361dc5d547e04f8250eff X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c361dc5d547e04f8250eff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Can someone please have a look into this review request. Thanks, Girish On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Girish Chaudhari wrote: > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/20007/ > Review request for cloudstack and prashant mishra. > By Girish Chaudhari. > *Bugs: * CLOUDSTACK-2697 > *Repository: * cloudstack-git > Description > > CLOUDSTACK-2697 - cluster id in alert message is null {alertType:: 1 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: 1 // clusterId:: null } > > The Cluster ID is getting populated as null in the logs for the alert messages. In the code base the ClusterId has been hardcoded as null for the log messages. I have modified to code to provide the actual cluster ID. > > Testing > > Tested on the 4.3 platform. > > Diffs > > - server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java (2a343d5) > > View Diff > --001a11c361dc5d547e04f8250eff--