cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.1.0
Date Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:37:10 GMT
Did it previously? Cloudmonkey always generates a signature and will not work without an apikey
and secret key. What would be the point of using the unprivileged port?

From: Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com<mailto:shadowsor@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 at 11:33 AM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.1.0

cloudmonkey no longer supports the unprivileged port?


On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com<mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com>> wrote:

Hi, thanks for the testing. Answers inline

From:  Srikanteswararao Talluri <srikanteswararao.talluri@citrix.com<mailto:srikanteswararao.talluri@citrix.com>>
Reply-To:  "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date:  Tuesday, April 29, 2014 at 11:11 AM
To:  "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject:  Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.1.0


I have tested username and password support for cloud monkey.

1.  It breaks when a non privileged user issue some commands.
For example: . When a non admin user issues Œlist zones¹
[CV] Not seen this. Can you let us know the error message? You can also
check the api.log and the cloudmonkey logs to debug further
2. It is not handled when the api port is set to 8096 and (username,
password) are provided.
[CV] Is this the unprivileged port? Cloudmonkey does not support the
unprivileged port (which is closed by default anyway)
3. What takes precedence when (apikey, secret key) and (username,
password) both are provided.
[CV] apikey is used in preference.



Thanks,
~Talluri

On 29/04/14 2:01 pm, "sebgoa" <runseb@gmail.com<mailto:runseb@gmail.com>> wrote:

>
>On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:40 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
><Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com<mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
>> Please follow the Release test procedure below
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2iNqAg
>
>
>Followed the testing procedure and tested on exoscale
>
>+1
>
>
>>
>> From: Chiradeep Vittal
>><chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com<mailto:chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com><mailto:chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>>
>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>><dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>> Date: Thursday, April 24, 2014 at 5:12 PM
>> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>><dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.1.0
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 5.1.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following
>>artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>
>>
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=sh
>>or
>> tlog;h=refs/heads/5.1.0
>> Commit: 0b7a6bce246bbf261e6f096d1c18a85949ed5a22
>>
>> List of changes:
>>
>>
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=bl
>>ob
>> _plain;f=CHANGES;hb=5.1.0
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.1.0/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using E8DAE809):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>




Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message