cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Karl Harris <karl.har...@sungardas.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 18795: Sanity code review for: JIRA CloudStack-764 nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC
Date Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:32:34 GMT
Daan,

Much clearer response, Thanks.

Be Well.

Karl



On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>wrote:

> H Karl, it doesn't appear so to me. My point was that keepalive should
> run over any interface that needs to be guarded. This menas all the
> guestnetworks, the optional private gateway network and the management
> and possibly even the public interface.
>
> maybe I was a little short on words describing this.
>
> Daan
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Karl Harris <karl.harris@sungardas.com>
> wrote:
> > Daan,
> >
> > I appears your response was truncated.
> >
> > Karl
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> One answer inline...
> >>
> >> mobile bilingual spell checker used
> >>
> >> Op 24 apr. 2014 16:54 schreef "Karl Harris" <karl.harris@sungardas.com
> >:
> >> ....
> >> > A related question is should the vrr
> >> > protocol<
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Router_Redundancy_Protocol
> >> >
> >> > used
> >> > by Keepalived <http://www.keepalived.org/> be passed on the
> Cloudstack
> >> > Management network or an isolated network between the master and
> >> > backup router?
> >> On all the networks that should be served redundantly, e.g. all.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Sounds like a single guru should do the job.
> >> > > Also I would think of some offerings that contain affinity so that
> the
> >> > > guru has a guideline as to where to deploy the pair of routers. For
> a
> >> > > certain type of network design a admin may already know where the
> >> > > routers should be deployed and in that case it makes no sense to let
> >> > > the guru do any calculations on that. The admin should be able to
> >> > > specify it with tags or the likes. Of course the criteria you
> mention
> >> > > must not conflict but I think it makes sense to have a admin created
> >> > > offering override the standard algorithm.
> >> > >
> >> > > regards,
> >> > > Daan
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Karl Harris <
> >> karl.harris@sungardas.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > The functional spec for Redundant Virtual Router for VPC's states:
> >> > > > Deployment for RvR
> >> > > >
> >> > > >    - Mgmt server would try to deploy two VR in the physical
> devices
> >> as
> >> > > far
> >> > > >    apart as possible. It would try different pod, different
> cluster,
> >> > > different
> >> > > >    storage, different host first, until there is none of above
> >> condition
> >> > > can
> >> > > >    be met, it would deploy both of them in the same host.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is a design method in a PrivateRedundantNetworkGuru NetworkGuru
> >> class(es)
> >> > > > the most appropriate place to put this code?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Separate Guru's for each of the pod,cluster,storage, host
> entities or
> >> a
> >> > > > single Guru that "designs" using the above criteria?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Karl
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Karl Harris <
> karl.harris@sungard.com
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> >> > > >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/
> >> > > >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Review request for cloudstack.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Repository: cloudstack-git
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Description
> >> > > >> -------
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Changes/additions to BASH scripts and .java files as well
as
> pseudo
> >> code
> >> > > >> comments. This posting is a sanity check review posting;
before I
> >> get
> >> > > too
> >> > > >> far along with making the changes required for this JIRA
> >> CloudStack-764
> >> > > >> nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC I thought
I'd
> >> publish
> >> > > my
> >> > > >> intentions to the community to review and comment.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Diffs
> >> > > >> -----
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>   core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/SetupGuestNetworkCommand.java
> >> > > >> 2cf5bf8ffaa2b0df122c69f047ee3f56982267e1
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
> >> > > >> 03af0da51b1eec93eb878fd1ebeca2ff2e0802ce
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
> >> > > >> 69b7c9e07c753c0f0c93197a809acfb3399cf555
> >> > > >>   systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/vpc_guestnw.sh
> >> > > >> e5da2e096b30f6fdb15226e889517537d04f2e3e
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/diff/
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Testing
> >> > > >> -------
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> None, yet still coding
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thanks,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Karl Harris
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Daan
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message