cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
Subject Re: [ACS44][DISCUSS] alpha releases for testing
Date Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:02:32 GMT
It might be interesting to put out RC1 as an Alpha...even if we spin it up
several times (we would still just release only the first RC as an Alpha
and not follow up with other RCs for Alpha purposes).

Most of the users probably wouldn't hit the issues we find with the RCs
right away anyways, so they would still serve the useful purpose of
pounding away on other aspects of the RC that maybe the developers/testers
on dev@ didn't find.


On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>wrote:

> Yes,
> I must admit I have a secondary objectiive. It will force me to
> investigate the release procedure before the moment supreme. I don't
> know to much about it yet.
> On the other hand; Publising it on users@ might give some people with
> time at hand or stakes in the next relese to test it.
> Anything to improve how we went last time?
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > So, are you thinking we'd reach a certain point in the dev/test cycle,
> then
> > notify people on users@ that they can download and test the official
> Alpha
> > release of version x.y?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> It would be a case of 'here is something, please put your teeth in it'
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> >> <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Daan,
> >> >
> >> > I'm all for earlier testing, of course, but can you clarify how this
> >> alpha
> >> > testing would fit into our schedule?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> ls,
> >> >>
> >> >> to facilitate and encourage testing, would it be a good idea to do
> >> >> alpha releases of the 4.4 branche early? the idea is that more of the
> >> >> last minute testing we had with 4.3 will happen earlier, thus
> >> >> relieving both the release manager and the citrix QA department of
> the
> >> >> last minute pressure.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Daan
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> >> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> >> > o: 303.746.7302
> >> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> >> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >> > *(tm)*
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*(tm)*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message