cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master
Date Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:07:15 GMT
creating a new router does the same...

2014-03-14 02:06:41,446 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Unable to update
VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running; updated=3;
time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1; State=Running;
updated=3; time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} Stale Data: {Host=1;
State=Starting; updated=2; time=Fri Mar 14 02:05:52 MDT 2014}
2014-03-14 02:06:41,448 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Failed to start
instance VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]
com.cloud.exception.ConcurrentOperationException: Unable to transition
to a new state.
at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1029)
at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:775)

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no idea if its related to this branch merge or not, but I'm
> unable to start the ssvm on master since I pulled about an hour ago. I
> can deploy a fresh zone, and the ssvm will actually start, but it
> can't transition state in the DB, so it kills the vm.
>
> 2014-03-14 01:57:46,356 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-1:Job-33/Job-34 ctx-5fc7b113) Unable to update
> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running;
> updated=19; time=Fri Mar 14 01:57:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1;
> State=Running; updated=19; time=Fri Mar 14 01:57:11 MDT 2014} Stale
> Data: {Host=1; State=Starting; updated=18; time=Fri Mar 14 01:56:38
> MDT 2014}
> 2014-03-14 01:57:46,359 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-1:Job-33/Job-34 ctx-5fc7b113) Failed to start
> instance VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1-VM]
> com.cloud.exception.ConcurrentOperationException: Unable to transition
> to a new state.
> at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1029)
> at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5129)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
> at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5274)
> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:491)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:448)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we
>> are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or preserve
>> history. It's nice to preserve history, but it's a lot easier to undo
>> a squashed merge.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Min Chen <min.chen@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> IAM branch is now merged to master.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -min
>>>
>>> On 3/13/14 10:13 AM, "Min Chen" <min.chen@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Since we haven't heard of any objections to this merge for 3 days, I am
>>>>going to merge it to master today.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>-min
>>>>
>>>>On 3/11/14 12:23 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" <hugo@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On 11 mrt. 2014, at 19:52, Min Chen <min.chen@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, have already run FingBugs on our branch and addressed all new
>>>>>> findings introduced by our branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>Awesome! :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/10/14 7:33 PM, "Min Chen" <min.chen@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No new jar dependencies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2014, at 7:22 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
>>>>>>>> <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any new jar dependencies?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/14, 11:34 AM, "Min Chen" <min.chen@citrix.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Prachi and I would like to merge CloudStack Identity
and Access
>>>>>>>>> Management(IAM) plugin services to the master branch.
Development
>>>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>>> this effort has been done by Prachi and me on ACS rbac
branch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>=r
>>>>>>>>> ef
>>>>>>>>> s/heads/rbac).
>>>>>>>>> Checklists for the merge:
>>>>>>>>> 1. JIRA ticket:
>>>>>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5920.
>>>>>>>>> 2. Functional Specs:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Ide
>>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>ti
>>>>>>>>> ty
>>>>>>>>> +and+Access+Management+%28IAM%29+Plugin. We have proposed
this
>>>>>>>>>feature
>>>>>>>>> back in Jan, and accommodated all the feedbacks in our
>>>>>>>>>implementation.
>>>>>>>>> 3. Unit tests for the feature are available at:
>>>>>>>>> services/iam/server/test
>>>>>>>>> (for iam server) and services/iam/plugin/test (for iam
plugin).
>>>>>>>>> 4. Marvin integration tests for the feature are available
at:
>>>>>>>>> test/integration/smoke/test_vm_iam.py.
>>>>>>>>> 5. Branch has been rebased with master branch up to commit
>>>>>>>>> 63e3eea7905e22cab9466b28a2ab2a80b586aeed.
>>>>>>>>> 6. RAT test has been passed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Mime
View raw message