cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Ough <alex.o...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:58:40 GMT
And I also uploaded the patch B that includes new implementation to support
multi regions.

Thanks
Alex Ough


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Alex Ough <alex.ough@sungard.com> wrote:

> I uploaded the patch A that includes only core changes, so please review
> it and let me know if you have any comments.
>
> Thanks
> Alex Ough
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Alex Ough <alex.ough@sungard.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chiradeep,
>>
>> Can you give me the example of the Singleton service class you mentioned?
>> I'm not sure if you are asking the name changes or else because those
>> classes are abstract classes and do not need to be singleton class.
>>
>> And let me try the refactoring and ask confirmations to you, so I hope I
>> can get the reply soon.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alex Ough
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> H Alex, I considder Chiradeeps comments quite valid and serious enough
>>> to anticipate not making friday 14:00 CET. That would mean no merge
>>> before 4.4. Can you live with that?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
>>> <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Alex,
>>> >
>>> > If you look at the general design of CloudStack, there are Singleton
>>> > service interfaces which are then implemented with real classes. This
>>> > facilitates easy testing by mocking the interface. In your new files
>>> > (BaseInterface, which by the way is NOT an interface, AccountService,
>>> > which is NOT a service like other CloudStack services, and so on), this
>>> > design paradigm is not followed. Therefore it is incongruous to the
>>> rest
>>> > of the code base.
>>> >
>>> > Furthermore this has been plopped right in the middle of other core
>>> > CloudStack code (server/src/com/cloud/region/). If you look at the
>>> > EventBus logic, it has been written as a plugin, thereby enabling users
>>> > who do not need it to disable it. This level of configuration is needed
>>> > and I can't find it.
>>> >
>>> > So, to  summarize:
>>> > 1. Split it into patches. Patch A is the change to the core DAOs, db
>>> > logic, schema upgrade code, etc.
>>> > 2. Patch B is the actual sync service written as an optional plugin
>>> with
>>> > the package name space of org.apache.
>>> >
>>> > On 3/11/14, 3:09 PM, "Alex Ough" <alex.ough@sungard.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>Hi Daan,
>>> >>
>>> >>I didn't update the patch after the couple of works because I wanted
>>> to do
>>> >>it with others Chiradeep asked if any.
>>> >>Let me know when you want me to.
>>> >>
>>> >>Thanks
>>> >>Alex Ough
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Daan Hoogland
>>> >><daan.hoogland@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I will call the merge in a moment, but won't do it immediately.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Be there for me when any issues come up. If not I will revert it.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> @Chiradeep: did Alex answer your concerns adequately?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> kind regards,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Alex Ough <alex.ough@sungard.com>
>>> >>>wrote:
>>> >>> > I worked on a couple of items, so can you give me the confirmation
>>> for
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> > rest items so that I can wrap this up?
>>> >>> > I really want to include this into 4.4.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Thanks
>>> >>> > Alex Ough
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Alex Ough <alex.ough@sungard.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> Please see my reply/question in blue.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Thanks
>>> >>> >> Alex Ough
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>>> >>> >> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> I havenĀ¹t looked at it because it is huge. But preliminary
scan:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> - there are unit tests missing for changes to core
CS code
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>          Unit tests for only new classes were added because
I
>>> >>>couldn't
>>> >>> >> find unit tests of the ones I modified
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> - uses com.amazonaws.util.json (why?)
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>          They are used to handle the json objects. Let
me know if
>>> you
>>> >>> >> want me to replace it with another.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> - code format does not follow coding convention ( placement
of {},
>>> >>>camel
>>> >>> >>> case api_interface )
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>          Done
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> - package namespace is com.cloud instead of org.apache
for new
>>> files
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>          I didn't know that. So do I need to use 'org.apache'
>>> package
>>> >>> for
>>> >>> >> all new classes?
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> - no file-level comments. What does LocalAccountManager
do? Why
>>> does
>>> >>>it
>>> >>> >>> exist? Etc.
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>          Done.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> - No interfaces, only abstract classes. No use of @Inject.
While
>>> >>>this
>>> >>> >>> might be OK, it does make it harder to test and does
not follow
>>> the
>>> >>> rest
>>> >>> >>> of ACS conventions.
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>         I don't think there is any interface, but let me
know if
>>> you
>>> >>> find
>>> >>> >> any.
>>> >>> >>         Any recommendation to replace @inject?
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> I would urge the submitter to break up the submission.
>>> >>> >>> A) the changes to CS core, with explanations / comments
and tests
>>> >>> >>> B) the sync service should be an interface with concrete
>>> >>> implementations
>>> >>> >>> in its own package
>>> >>> >>> C) more tests
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>         can you give me a little specific what kind of
tests you
>>> need
>>> >>> >> more?
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>>  On 3/10/14, 3:37 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>>> >>>wrote:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> >Hi everyody,
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >The people at sungard have been making this change
for 4.4 and I
>>> >>>want
>>> >>> >>> >to merge/apply it this week. It is more then a
screenfull and
>>> might
>>> >>> >>> >cause issue is a setup or two.
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >have a look at https://reviews.apache.org/r/17790/
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >a ref to ticket and fs page are in the review request.
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >kind regards,
>>> >>> >>> >--
>>> >>> >>> >Daan
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Daan
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daan
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message