cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Abhinandan Prateek <Abhinandan.Prat...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Date Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:28:50 GMT
Daan,

  It seems that the dependency on the connector can be changed so that the
connector is not packaged with the product.
Once Damodar, who is fixing it provides a patch we can take a call.

-abhi



On 21/02/14 5:31 pm, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:

>Animesh,
>
>Having followed the legal discussions and remarks from David on these
>matters, I will have to retract my +1 and cast a -1 (binding). I
>suggest we postpone 4.3 indefinitely awaiting legal advice and
>discussion on how to proceed on this list.
>
>sorry,
>Daan
>
>On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, benoit lair <kurushi4000@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree with Florin about GRE tunnel. It is very problematic. If i can't
>> get GRE tunnels working with xenserver 6.2, i won't be able to use the
>>ACS
>> 4.3
>>
>> So the jira CLOUDSTACK-5967 is not resolved, isn't it ?
>>
>> Murali, you said on the Feb 14th (CLOUDSTACK-5967) that if there is a
>>new
>> RC :
>> "Fix is simple, but not sure we can get this into 4.3, given
>> its not regression. Will get this in if there is a new RC."
>>
>> Is it still relevant ?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Benoit Lair.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-21 11:29 GMT+01:00 Srikanteswararao Talluri <
>> srikanteswararao.talluri@citrix.com>:
>>
>>> There is a bug filed for live migration on ESXi 5.5.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6146
>>>
>>> I feel we need to fix this bug too in 4.3.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ~Talluri
>>>
>>> On 20/02/14 11:19 pm, "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chip Childers
>>><chipchilders@apache.org>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:21AM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Given the recently noticed legal issues with the
>>>mysql-connector-java
>>> >> dependency, I'm -1 (binding) until that is resolved.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >I hate to have to issue a -1 (binding) but will do so as well.
>>> >
>>> >--David
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Daan


Mime
View raw message