cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2014 23:04:54 GMT
Nux, that's an entirely different problem. Care to raise a feature request?

On 2/20/14 11:34 AM, "Nux!" <> wrote:

>On 19.02.2014 22:12, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> The fact that one has to have a HTTP server to host templates before
>> the templates can be imported into secondary storage is an
>> inconvenience. I am not sure how much of an inconvenience it is, but I
>> was asked to detail the technical architecture, if it needed to be
>> supported. Certainly, I can imagine for folks coming in contact with
>> ACS for the first time, it might seem onerous to set up another web
>> server.
>> I've sketched a strawman proposal [1] to support browser-based
>> uploads of templates and volumes to secondary storage.
>> It is not yet a PROPOSAL since it is still raw (and I do not have
>> time to work on this immediately).
>> Please comment on this.
>> [1]
>A small request, can we enhance this feature so that it will generate
>multiple templates with different storage?
>For example now when I add a Linux template it has to be in different
>sizes: 10GB, 20GB, 40GB, 100GB, 200GB etc. Another round of templates
>for say Windows, another for eg Linux+CPanel and so on and so forth. I
>end up adding tons of templates (really one of my biggest pet peeves
>with ACS) whereas with the same setup in openstack or onapp I just need
>to add 3.
>Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

View raw message