cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads
Date Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:04:12 GMT
Yeah, that's an option too. It's sometimes very inconvenient, but
that's what was intended. At any rate I don't think we want to
automatically create multiple templates of different sizes after
upload, I'd rather see the root resize.

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
<Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> Heh, AWS seems to manage fine without it. But that is AWS.
> Service offerings are only for compute, there is a separate disk offering
> for the data volumes. Presumably the data volumes can be used for
> persistent storage (e.g., db files). What is the difference between a 40G
> Drupal template and an 80G Drupal template? Surely that extra 40G could be
> on a data volume?
>
> On 2/20/14 3:11 PM, "Nux!" <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>
>>On 20.02.2014 23:04, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>> Nux, that's an entirely different problem. Care to raise a feature
>>> request?
>>
>>It's been here for a while:
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5305
>>
>>It's a major PITA for me (and I imagine for anyone else who wants to
>>sell cloud publicly).
>>
>>--
>>Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>>Nux!
>>www.nux.ro
>

Mime
View raw message