Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com
 designates 103.14.252.240 as permitted sender)
From: Santhosh Edukulla <santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com>
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: 4.3 : Developer Profile, tools module commented 
Thread-Topic: 4.3 : Developer Profile, tools module commented 
Thread-Index: Ac8GPG6ZgjNaj8yHQZmvX43dnDFMSQE+LqZgAA2dOaM=
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:07:12 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CB688D716959224C95995F52DE5E82420EBCCF37@SINPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
References: 
 <CB688D716959224C95995F52DE5E82420EBC2E01@SINPEX01CL02.citrite.net>,<F7F94CD9B5E67A448CE8C69340A88B491CD69B@SJCPEX01CL03.citrite.net>
In-Reply-To: <F7F94CD9B5E67A448CE8C69340A88B491CD69B@SJCPEX01CL03.citrite.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

1. Not sure build it is taking much time because of tools module.  tools al=
so builds apidoc which could be intentional( may be ) to include it as part=
 of developer profile and has its subsequent references for marvin.=20

2. We can bring it back for now under developer profile. Especially, we hav=
e RC lined up now and current usage could have references to usages\mention=
 at  that other places like docs\wiki\current of using the current way of b=
uilding and using tools.Impatient seems to be little misnomer to use.

3. There was a reference to speed up build time @ http://markmail.org/messa=
ge/3ch4lgaq4yjaop7e?q=3Ddarren+shepherd+mvn

Regards,
Santhosh
________________________________________
From: Frank Zhang [Frank.Zhang@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 6:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: 4.3 : Developer Profile, tools module commented

Sorry this was by a mistake.
The maven build costs too long so I comment tools out as it's rarely used b=
y developer build. later on I found there is
a profile called 'impatient' which does exactly the same thing.
before bring it back, I wonder if it's right to put 'tools' in developer pr=
ofile? I am sure 90% developer won't use it. Why not
move it to a profile only used by RPM build?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 7:25 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: 4.3 : Developer Profile, tools module commented
>
> Team,
>
> For branch 4,3, the below commit appears to have commented the tools
> module under developer profile. Any specific reason?
>
> commit fb1f3f0865c254abebfa5a43f66cef116fe36165
> Author: Frank.Zhang <frank.zhang@citrix.com>
> Date:   Mon Oct 7 18:03:12 2013 -0700
>
>     Add missing Baremetal security_group_agent java part
>     Change security_group_agent python side in line with default security
>     group rules change in 4.2
>
>     Conflicts:
>
>
> plugins/hypervisors/baremetal/src/com/cloud/baremetal/networkservice/Bare
> MetalResourceBase.java
>
> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> index 2cee084..31946d8 100644
> --- a/pom.xml
> +++ b/pom.xml
> @@ -747,7 +747,9 @@
>        </properties>
>        <modules>
>          <module>developer</module>
> +        <!--
>          <module>tools</module>
> +-->
>        </modules>
>      </profile>
>      <profile>
>
> Thanks!
> Santhosh=