Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-51204-apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67D9110A6A
	for <apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 23198 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2014 15:11:27 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22970 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2014 15:11:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cloudstack.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22959 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2014 15:11:26 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:11:26 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of daan.hoogland@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.173] (HELO mail-vc0-f173.google.com)
 (209.85.220.173)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:11:19 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ld13so2150550vcb.18
        for <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:10:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=Xsa4bW8ScLajaVI3LbASuVMM679EZWbR15tSWO8qayA=;
        b=pA6U8M9NTaZO7rp+TA5HANbxHYLS76d90RtVmkQM3SGUT238MwvI23acdlmthiYxBw
         O2krclEYCj7fLKUcl+B1Aq29O1SuRQxach04Cavjx0J3C52v8tnv4UdTTJvhoflRyNF+
         fw/zSfVxHlB1McdwalCH7UvNUDw8gjk+OvpjwLzU1vo+gf4sqNSkYflBO0dRw3tnok7n
         DzyHZ+jgmSXfwjxhx7Q277FL7enlIU07Bwk2GgVSxzWY6ZqMJ3lUUmwtFbF4MQw4122F
         9gpotLy3GRqqNhSI1qgmzvTwM0TfdoGP2UB6SbwvamKAePPrFsumE4K+edHjlzH9zP+6
         kgUA==
X-Received: by 10.236.41.225 with SMTP id h61mr164338yhb.152.1391094658776;
 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:10:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.207.68 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:10:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:10:38 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGQtxvaNxttC1N2ZUr+uzEdH9kkwfk2igeQNDZhnV19opZ3Kcg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list
To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

H everyone,

I've been putting out weekly reports on both the user - and the dev
lists about unanswerred questions. I feel like dropping the one on the
dev list. As I had not much feedback on them I was thinking of
dropping both but forcing myself to scan the old users mail still
seems like a valid excercise for myself.

Anyone still interested?

regards,
Daan