From dev-return-50477-apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org Tue Jan 21 07:26:31 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19285106F9 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49068 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2014 07:26:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 49033 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2014 07:26:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 48297 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2014 07:26:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:26:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trippie@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.173] (HELO mail-ea0-f173.google.com) (209.85.215.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:26:22 +0000 Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id d10so744118eaj.4 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:26:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VsXOuu8uBoL2BLHwdZvhbBQdHOlEaLExagSWqWmwL7E=; b=w6TGkOJTSsxFNWZMK+SHdCLvUz++mJnvd2Fz2oxYMZh7N6WQ/1lg6EYn4EAvRT3c41 PVrtHPZrfNVoIcxgsnZmsTzlvehb3TX0ngKY8H4l4wfXiKoqtFTuns6pUoCjAWu+IzfM 00rVfjk0GcYQTuyf/TSoSOD8cnP3BaCIXuiYsnT/dmyJtiuNRor7GCvEaqjC2TV5yGUN umLOKplcS9iFpp/TMaS8SRZZ3vXG8LM89pR/GsbcdRnq7JecQijIzGZ1uimKivYOu+tf BW/WnhVqLT85z8TkZCDpiDDWK0+no+9fgbDudFBE/WQkKTXxoOmNRkUoq4LMdtJ4hb5W /1tw== X-Received: by 10.15.111.6 with SMTP id ci6mr21584558eeb.59.1390289162254; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.215] ([95.142.96.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u7sm11488705eep.11.2014.01.20.23.26.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:26:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: Trippie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: systemvm templates From: Hugo Trippaers In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:25:59 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <49532750-15BF-4E5C-896E-67D3600F1284@GMAIL.com> References: <3A2B3059-46D4-419B-87BB-DF83C251EB52@GMAIL.com> <20CF38CB4385CE4D9D1558D52A0FC0581EB18E@SJCPEX01CL03.citrite.net> <87298203-6537-4D83-B9DF-3C796CD2C772@gmail.com> To: dev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Abhi, The ticket you reference states that it works fine with java 1.6.4x or = higher. Is that indeed the case? Then we don=A1=AFt need to upgrade the = java version. Also the same code is running in the management server, = which also depends on java 1.6. Has anyone reported the same problems = for the management server? I=A1=AFm very much against running java 7 on the systemvm while java 6 = is still being used for the cloudstack management server. If we upgrade, = we should do both. Cheers, Hugo On 21 jan. 2014, at 07:54, Abhinandan Prateek = wrote: > Hugo, >=20 > I went and looked at several support tickets that were filed. > Filed this ticket: = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5914 > summarising the issue. > There was a good amount of affect that went into troubleshooting this = and > finally nailing it to Java version. >=20 > Several test were done in various environments to nail it down. I was = not > able to find enough information to nail it to a particular java known > issues or get enough information to file a bug against java version = 1.6.2. > Since, internally we are convinced that this is a serious issue we = will go > ahead with the fix, I will put the patch for review for ASF. >=20 > -abhi >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 18/01/14 12:45 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >=20 >> Hey Abhi, >>=20 >> Do you have more details on this? A stacktrace or error log would be >> great. >>=20 >> I would really need to see the details before we make a decision on = this. >>=20 >> Cheers, >>=20 >> Hugo >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >>> On 17 jan. 2014, at 23:42, Abhinandan Prateek >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>> In SSVM for VMWare, copying template to primary storage fails in = some >>> cases with jre 6. >>>=20 >>> -abhi >>>=20 >>>> On 18/01/14 1:08 am, "Alex Huang" wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Why is jre7 required for vmware? Kelven, you have any idea? >>>>=20 >>>> --Alex >>>>=20 >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:Abhinandan.Prateek@citrix.com] >>>>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:08 AM >>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: systemvm templates >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hugo, >>>>>=20 >>>>> First of all my bad that I jumped the gun on jre7 change. I will = be >>>>> testing the >>>>> full build on master and then update the urls and other changes. >>>>> In the current template jre7 package is not available by default, >>>>> needs >>>>> apt- >>>>> get update. jre7 is a absolute necessity for VMWare template. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Once I have a successful local build I will update the thread. >>>>>=20 >>>>> -abhi >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 17/01/14 10:20 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Abhi, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I have the debian 7.0.0 isis local on the jenkins server, so we = don=A9=F6t >>>>>> depend on the external URLs. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Do you want to switch master to the new image? No trouble for me = to >>>>>> make it happen. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hugo >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 17 jan. 2014, at 17:12, Abhinandan Prateek >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> While trying to build systemvm templates I noticed that the urls = to >>>>>>> download the debian images are invalid as in definition.rb in >>>>>>> respective >>>>>>> folders: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> For 64 bit template >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> = http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.0.0/i386/iso-cd/de >>>>>>> b >>>>>>> ian >>>>>>> -7.0.0-i386-netinst.iso >>>>>>> For 32 bit template >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> = http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.0.0/i386/iso-cd/de >>>>>>> b >>>>>>> ian >>>>>>> -7.0.0-i386-netinst.iso >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I will be updating these to following respectively, once I have = a >>>>>>> successful local build: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> = http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/cdimage/release/7.3.0/i386/iso-cd/debian >>>>>>> - >>>>> 7.3 >>>>>>> .0-i386-netinst.iso MD5: 04c58f30744e64a0459caf7d7cace479 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> = http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/cdimage/release/7.3.0/ia64/iso-cd/debian >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 7.3 .0-ia64-netinst.iso MD5: a6b93666a5393334accb7ac4ee28d949 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Not sure if jenkins job is building the right templates now ? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> -abhi >>>=20 >=20