cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: cidrs in acls
Date Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:19:02 GMT
That was what I thought as well. What was the retionale to join them
into one field?

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Kishan Kavala <Kishan.Kavala@citrix.com> wrote:
> Daan,
>   Similar to firewall_rules_cidrs, separate table can be used to store acl cidrs. Maybe
in network_acl_item_cidrs.
>
> Regards,
> kishan
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 1:05 AM
>> To: Kishan Kavala
>> Cc: dev
>> Subject: cidrs in acls
>>
>> H Kishan,
>>
>> I see you implemented CLOUDSTACK-763. it merges a lot of cidrs into one field.
>> The api doesn't check the field length. I enlarged the field in the create table
>> statement to 2048 for the 4.3 branch. Can you help me think about a more solid
>> solution, please. It seems to me those cidrs shouldn't be joint into one field.
>>
>> regards,
>> Daan

Mime
View raw message