Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-48478-apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DBD5107ED
	for <apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:25:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 64257 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2013 04:24:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64070 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2013 04:24:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cloudstack.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64062 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2013 04:24:56 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:24:56 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Received: from [209.85.128.169] (HELO mail-ve0-f169.google.com)
 (209.85.128.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:24:51 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c14so5670528vea.0
        for <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:24:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=+InpkeCqEX4cclIhzKv9Q2Kk4sHlsCmVL0MkPRgy07U=;
        b=NvBJpR+ouyAHQ6bj5DaYQm+QXFUKQ9LgcT3uaahnslI70P89h7njrmgjVI3BLthQ3j
         tjKeZUgK7+0fbrvZ/yKv9zSZo+WUAwd9WA58f9hxTNFYSU/XRcpVtPXNxXLAnzf79FVl
         2PKOBpjg+JM48jnr7RxwQGCb/xzdg6lI98NJZxSN8Tbl3BtaecnfI1eiExdS9trAUb4R
         tI3/r5ROu3o5pjo+iWgBoU00SiirHO72bdFmLdaBsUjpYRo9xPIhcUvsMyreEl7IL9fB
         6Kja+4ElTY5I9xchhRM38UWeqnvQ4uDQomVK4gApDHJessb8L4C5YWaWua1a3qfLEJft
         yccg==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQmFq9rknBz0gVuITPK9J2oj3IaNvGG22Fdq5k8JnLF7Y6pRIgaALZQQ1WAq2RtPKata5+wU
X-Received: by 10.58.144.168 with SMTP id sn8mr1704964veb.33.1386735870333;
 Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:24:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.0.137 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:24:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <83F77FF1BD50194AB65AFA5479D082A717CA65@SJCPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
References: <CECD0BB9.4B2DF%abhinandan.prateek@citrix.com>
 <CECD1309.4B2FB%abhinandan.prateek@citrix.com>
 <CAGQtxvYd33nqDr1GJh38p1vdtN3x2LsiLk7gii_CTXr=tKjC+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <83F77FF1BD50194AB65AFA5479D082A717CA65@SJCPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
From: David Nalley <david@gnsa.us>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:24:10 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAKprHVZxWHWSHnuA1F5g4SH7f4RrqjOhAL5xUHSfOTRs524ahg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 third RC
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu@citrix.com> wrote:
> My best guess is you don't have vhd-util in your management server.
>
> Check if vhd-util exists in /opt/cloud/bin in your XS host, if not,  you need to do following,
> 1. make sure vhd-util is downloaded in your management server
> 2. clear XS host tag, execute following command in each XS
>       Xe host-param-clear host-uuid=<host uuid> param-name=tags
> 3. restart management server
>

We expect a sysadmin to touch every single hypervisor manually and run
this command?
Is this documented in the upgrade directions? Is it right in the
install instructions?
Why, for a bug fix release would we do something like change the
expected location of vhd-util on a XS host?

--David