Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 796A010FAD for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93638 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2013 19:54:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 93606 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2013 19:54:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 93598 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2013 19:54:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 19:54:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [74.125.149.71] (HELO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 19:54:33 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob103.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUqDZ40cJRJra9p5ei+GuOHsaPvX2jf1h@postini.com; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:54:12 PST Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wp4so18525176obc.27 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:54:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7YcZ1RUC5zPoIu43IAU/SctQqeU5TrkOS7zs+Voa20E=; b=Daaz9WdhTBNnyJlULNcTk4kGd8pZr/g8f+9628k1kuJfopWetJycXCgnEK9P8/pNar mBZlJqmos/1m0vojujaSpP1hui+FHhFzrTNKxGbsTjWM9/A+UAFB4FpHMgC3RW/CXOSX o//nzmdBW1gD6pbujMcBrsYm64hWTYK0Ltt16pjdDtGt8pav25D+pHUf12JLmzz0XeTe RLgPPGvYDTITKRBeIl2VWe80Q4KqSDCApDxI9DwwUCLJeUChukJd4lM7fh8tGnsNkA7r swlb44v/dH4eGQA9jCCc4FTiR7eo+NxBs3rKBnCjfd0DAQaiN3kuJGKSE7yfqPHldBIe xcRg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlk74P2bJ6m0oUdSWrteb6Bta9PBETE8Ch8EtLnUf6DzkqnqNt0tKS/VCo5zXiph7L9tkEaK3Ne1vblDjobMiGUMH1+GXecqxTtbtP8pzicK9Crc43YdOUNFx+n3Zml4wXNcT7X1VD1SP2rU3uI/qJ/+dLIWupiyaeWjd3SR25cLIz7pMI= X-Received: by 10.182.43.161 with SMTP id x1mr964216obl.5.1386273250601; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:54:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.43.161 with SMTP id x1mr964211obl.5.1386273250519; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.94.148 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:54:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:54:10 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: About the implementation of RvR From: Alex Ough To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" , sheng@yasker.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c30ce2a8b85c04eccee427 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c30ce2a8b85c04eccee427 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Sheng, I hope you're the right person for this, but if not, please let me know. Currently I'm planning to work on the redundant routers in VPC (CLOUDSTACK-764) because my company will need this feature in the near future and you seem to have implemented the RvR in non-VPC networks. I think it is appropriate to follow the same implementation with yours, so can I get the review request information of this implementation so that I can reference your implementation if possible? Thanks. Alex Ough --001a11c30ce2a8b85c04eccee427--