cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Abhinandan Prateek <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC
Date Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:42:58 GMT
It gives me immense pleasure to inform that the vote to label this ASF
4.2.1 RC as the GA release has been passed with following stats:

+1   : 6 votes includes 3 bindings from Daan, Wei and Chip.
+/-0 : from Tomasz.

Some issues have been pointed out by Tomasz (5422,5332 & 3806) and Andrei
(issue with KVM:S3). These will be addresses in the next release (4.3).

I would also like to thank team members who persistently tried respins and
helped point and fix issues. Also, members who made substantial effort to
fix docs, which was the cause of the first respin.

Needless to say, that there were many who tirelessly worked behind the
scenes to fix bugs, test, manage resources etc in order to make this a
quality release.

Next steps:

1. Tag the git commit with 4.2.1_GA
2. Building and publishing packages (DEB and RPM)
3. Publishing the docs here
4. Put the artefacts for download
5. Finalise the release announcement:
6. Announce the release on the website

I will take care of 1,5,6
In the past Wido took care of 2 (DEB packages) not sure who built the RPMs.
Sebastien I am assuming that you will take care of 3.
Chip it seems you took care of 4 for 4.2.


On 17/12/13 7:19 pm, "Abhinandan Prateek" <>

>The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate
>the previous RC did not get pushed to repo.
>Following are the particulars to vote for this time around:
>commit: 1b2b58fe352a19aee1721bd79b9d023d36e80ec5
>List of changes are available in Release Notes, a summary can be accessed
>Source release revision 3911 (checksums and signatures are available at
>the same location):
>PGP release keys (signed using RSA Key ID = 42443AA1):
>Vote will be open for 72 hours (until 20 Dec 2013 End of day PST).
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>[ ] +1  approve
>[ ] +0  no opinion
>[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

View raw message