cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>
Subject Re: About the implementation of RvR
Date Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:53:19 GMT
I meant, VPC and redundant router. :)

--Sheng


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:

> Sure!
>
> Yes, I am the right person for VPC. :)
>
> Redundant router for VPC would be a great improvement for CloudStack, I
> just haven't got enough time to work on that.
>
> I think the design would works mostly the same way, but there are things
> become more tricky for VPC e.g. hot plug nics and un-consequences public
> nics in the VPC VR(if multiple vlan is necessary). Many if not all scripts
> in the VR need to be changed to follow VPC
>
> I would very glad to help on RvR for VPC.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alex Ough <alex.ough@sungard.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sheng,
>>
>> I hope you're the right person for this, but if not, please let me know.
>>
>> Currently I'm planning to work on the redundant routers in VPC
>> (CLOUDSTACK-764) because my company will need this feature in the near
>> future and you seem to have implemented the RvR in non-VPC networks.
>>
>> I think it is appropriate to follow the same implementation with yours,
>> so can I get the review request information of this implementation so that
>> I can reference your implementation if possible?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Alex Ough
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message