Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE9E2109B7 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85714 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2013 17:49:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 85648 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2013 17:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 85387 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2013 17:48:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:48:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of daan.hoogland@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com) (209.85.223.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:48:43 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id tp5so14106628ieb.25 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:48:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=fwnt97pw7/JLxS+SUf+QJTtC8qdFM5BluepUseWntDs=; b=GJ+0YO9pRelprFpermNsrZrkGhHl5IwSnQbr2HSkK+hIr7hPiwwtbBcmd4/iZDRx5e t9pu3y+cLgx4wBaj6zAao93fRgBbnKwHLPwCC11/LCWMCUoASeg1NSV2+/uXdtorzvFl WLP7kDOnkn6KKw6LHisW2X6GQ9YZWVRNUS5A+sFPBnBVNkS1UJGqlOfk9laSVjPTszQp 3pOEz2GDbg15EZy41NzUmVB3Bv64th9lhhstP1Xs9U7I/+sr5S+KpGkGruRq1dnLfm5A 3P/8RVr4WWo4LfWEcqxtU/IBtwTrn/Kmy+nndx1atnTnnnXl1XjPP5JY40CnjQ69txVV mbxw== X-Received: by 10.50.117.3 with SMTP id ka3mr2961034igb.15.1385660902576; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:48:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.226.135 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:48:02 -0800 (PST) From: Daan Hoogland Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:48:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: contrail package organisation To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org H, Someone queried for the status of the contrail plugin and I noticed that the package structure is different then the other network plugins. The difference being that the contrail classes have 'contrail' in their package name. 1 is this intentional 2 is this going to hurt some automated plugin resolving mechanism? regards,.