Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC5981051C for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84379 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2013 20:08:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 84339 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2013 20:08:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 84331 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2013 20:08:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:08:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daan.hoogland@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.177] (HELO mail-ie0-f177.google.com) (209.85.223.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:08:15 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id qd12so2443451ieb.36 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:07:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=kN9CiUwGajuQlZVB+6sF9etoCktFFQRKTBghM/OB39E=; b=J8oHiB4x5Ea9S1UrlOMyKGp0ENDPUHjv4vDdCl0ou5mN1urvzp3iVIoGTF83feMynI nViGwJVZUvDNftDBqJO2NxnKwbXk2XV53+WhI02a//kJFaDn6uXj1PSOi9zR90cldTKj QdoYUFuJjhf3EcgwPmieWrpkzk8zSIdlUmCa8Z90T5lsFwJ9MxxQqwbVKagf8fUw6Xl9 V5LGq/KriygSfA8jDMceyampUOS5pESn7c10iSPoOgCs8nilXzz8RVKUSIAJ0Sy5uaXr 3i3+4Nxf2WcCzVVtIi/SxCb0HV6c5uJA16O/LMKeylgYSlA5qQZsZpn8HUQ3E0gTDyX1 vF0w== X-Received: by 10.50.40.37 with SMTP id u5mr16714843igk.29.1384286874768; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:07:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.226.135 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:07:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Daan Hoogland Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:07:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Go ahead Chiradeep, please cc me (and Nguyen), Am I on for tomorrow afternoons meeting? regards, Daan On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > There's also NFVI - Network Functions Virtualization Infrastructure > > On 11/12/13 11:26 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >>Well, i just learned something and someone sure loves confusion through >>acronyms >> >>-Sebastien >> >>On 12 Nov 2013, at 19:28, Chiradeep Vittal >>wrote: >> >>> VNF = virtualized network function (e.g., LB virtual appliance) >>> NFV = network functions virtualization (the whole kit and caboodle) >>> >>> On 11/12/13 6:53 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK, here's the draft of the Liaison request (template borrowed from >>>>> OpenDaylight) >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To: >>>>> ETSI Industry Study Group (ISG) on Network Functions Virtualization >>>>> Prodip Sen, Chairman NFV ISG prodip.sen@verizon.com >>>>> Andrew Malis, NFV Liaison Officer >>>>> >>>>> I am a member of the Apache CloudStack Project Management Committee >>>>> (PMC) >>>>> and have been asked to serve as liaison from the Apache CloudStack >>>>> community to the ETSI Industry Standard Group on Network Functions >>>>> Virtualization. >>>>> >>>>> Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and >>>>>manage >>>>> large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly >>>>> scalable >>>>> Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform. The >>>>> platform >>>>> has pioneered the use of VNF to provide network services to IAAS >>>>> tenants. >>>> >>>> NFV ????? not VNF ? >>>> >>>>> We are excited to see that NFV is going to realize its potential and >>>>> look >>>>> forward to collaborating to realize this promise expeditiously. >>>>> >>>>> The community would like to suggest these areas of collaboration: >>>>> >>>>> 1) ETSI NFV ISG Documents: It would be very helpful to receive >>>>>pointers >>>>> to the various documents being produced by the ETSI NFV ISG, even >>>>>before >>>>> their formal publication, so that your needs can be incorporated into >>>>> the >>>>> Apache CloudStack development effort. >>>>> >>>>> 2) Sharing ideas and experience: We have many shared goals and a >>>>>large >>>>> community of experienced cloud implementors. We have several >>>>> opportunities >>>>> where someone from ETSI NFV ISG could present to the Apache CloudStack >>>>> community, including meetups and online fora , and our CloudStack >>>>> Collaboration Summit. We would also be quite pleased to present on >>>>> Apache >>>>> CloudStack to ETSI NFV ISG in any forum you find appropriate. If >>>>> appropriate we can participate in working groups such as the MANO WG. >>>>> >>>>> 3) Open Source: We would love to get members of the ETSI NFV ISG >>>>> participate in our community, especially in design ideas, code >>>>> contributions and the like. We hope that we can assist in producing >>>>> reference implementations and help iterate faster on crucial issues >>>>>such >>>>> as interoperability. >>>>> >>>>> Of course we welcome other ideas for collaboration with the NFV ISG. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>-- >>>>> -- >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/11/13 1:02 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> How about Chiradeep makes the contact and proposal for CloudStack to >>>>>> join/be represented ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Then we can decide who is the representative. Daan could do it and >>>>>> Nguyen >>>>>> could be the substitute ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Daan Hoogland >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't mind being involved if needed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Chip Childers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:58:17AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: >>>>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Chiradeep Vittal >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> While I appreciate the confidence, there are weekly calls to >>>>>>>>>> attend. >>>>>>>>>> The particularly interesting one (MANO WG) happens on Wednesdays >>>>>>>>>>at >>>>>>>>>> 6am >>>>>>>>>> PST. >>>>>>>>>> I've tried but there's very little chance that I can attend these >>>>>>>>>> meetings. >>>>>>>>>> Anybody in a more agreeable timezone? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not sure if I have permitted to join, I'm in agreeable timezone >>>>>>>>>(9pm >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>> local time). It's great and I'm willing to join to liaison team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd say you are... you're a committer on the project. Perhaps you >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> Chiradeep can discuss how to get involved? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >