cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Radhika Puthiyetath <radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ACS4.2.1] request for QA update
Date Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:18:58 GMT
Could someone share the compatibility matrix for 4.2.1. This is to include in the RN.

-----Original Message-----
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:Abhinandan.Prateek@citrix.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:14 AM
To: Sudha Ponnaganti; CloudStack Dev
Cc: Raja Pullela
Subject: Re: [ACS4.2.1] request for QA update

Daan reported in another thread that "4.1.1 to 4.2.1 upgrade works fine in a lab env".

Raja/Lucian, any update on 2.2.14 upgrade ?

-abhi

On 11/11/13 9:17 pm, "Sudha Ponnaganti" <sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com<mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com>>
wrote:

Hi All,

Scope Status [1]

-          Rayees has posted automation results earlier BVTs and regressions were done in
citrix lab on 4.2.1 branch

-          Tested a few regressions around VMWare as there are couple of issues got fixed
in last phases of 4.2

-          250 issues got fixed for 4.2.1


Blockers for RC

-          We still have 7 Criticals/blockers that need to be fixed in JIRA ( Use query Fixed
version 4.2.1)

-          Upgrade paths need to be closed

o   4,2 ( citrix is trying this out - will report back Wednesday)

o   4.1.1 ( Daan will report back by Friday)

o   2.2.14 > ( Lucian has been trying this path)

Good to have for RC

-          There are 80 Resolved defects. Would help if community can close these ( you can
use query fix version 4.2.1, Status Resolved )

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2.1+Maintenance+Release
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2.1+Automation+Result

From: Abhinandan Prateek
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:56 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Raja Pullela; Sudha Ponnaganti
Subject: [ACS4.2.1] request for QA update

Sudha/Raja,

   You guys have been doing a QA on 4.2.1 for quite some time now.
It would be good for community to know in general how the 4.2.1 branch is coming off in terms
of quality.

-abhi

Mime
View raw message