cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: CloudStack.next
Date Fri, 15 Nov 2013 03:18:28 GMT
+1 to IAM.

An Autoscale service independent of Netscaler.
I'd like to see the built-in GRE controller fully fleshed out as a
distributed/cross-AZ virtual network provider. Make it the out-of-the-box
virtual network provider instead of VLAN.
Easier service vm insertion into virtual networks.
Better fidelity with AWS VPC APIs




On 11/12/13 6:09 PM, "Simon Murphy" <simon.Murphy@vifx.co.nz> wrote:

>As a CloudStack user, here are the ares that I feel need attention:
>
>- improved IAM and implementation of a full RBAC security model. This is
>hurting us right now.
>- improved VM import functionality (ie bulk import of VM's and import of
>running VM's from existing vSphere clusters)
>- improved backup functionality and integration with 3rd party tools
>- HA for VPC routers
>
>Cheers,
>Simon Murphy
>Solutions Architect
>      
>ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure
>Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010
>PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143
>M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy
>www.vifx.co.nz <http://www.vifx.co.nz/> follow us on twitter
><https://twitter.com/ViFX>
>Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch
>               
>
> 
>experience. expertise. execution.
> 
>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without
>prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege.
>It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is
>addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The
>content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the
>official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for
>any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following
>transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to
>read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information
>contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system.
>Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the
>communications sent to and from its email network.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 13/11/13 1:18 PM, "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Steve Wilson <steve.wilson@citrix.com>
>>wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As we ramp towards freeze on 4.3 and start talking about 4.4, I thought
>>>it would be fun to queue up a discussion here on the list before Collab
>>>next week.
>>>
>>> What do you envision in the next MAJOR release of CloudStack?  Call it
>>>5.0 or whatever you like, but what would you like to see there?  What
>>>would you change?  What would you enhance?  Are there big bets we should
>>>be placing as a community?
>>>
>>> Feel free to post any thoughts here and I'll look forward to talking to
>>>many of you in person at Collab next week.  You are coming to Collab,
>>>right?
>>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Steve,
>>
>>I'll be contrarian ;) - I don't see 5.0 (e.g. API breaking changes)
>>coming in at least the next 12-18 months. Breaking API compatibility
>>is a BIG DEAL IMO and should be done very deliberately and with a lot
>>of consideration, and a plan around how we help folks adapt.
>>
>>Think about the tons of integrations that we have now: Chef, Puppet,
>>Salt, libcloud, fog, jclouds, dasein, etc etc. Breaking that directly
>>disrupts our users who stand a good chance of using one of those
>>integrations or consume CloudStack via one of those tools.
>>
>>--David
>


Mime
View raw message