cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Srikanteswararao Talluri <srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
Date Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:07:14 GMT
+1 

I have deployed advanced zone with XenServer 6.2 host and system vms came
up with out any problem.
Tested following -
VM snapshot:
1. Deployed an instance and populated some data.
2. Took a snapshot.
3. Reverted the VM to the snapshot created in step2 and could see the data
that was present when the
Snapshot was taken.
PF rule:
1. Deployed an instance in isolated network
2. Created PF rule between 22 -> 2222
3. Added firewall rule for 2222
4. I could ssh to the public IP using port 2222.

Thanks,
~Talluri






On 13/11/13 10:14 pm, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:

>well, mine is a go, I have a symptom not a decease.
>
>On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
><Abhinandan.Prateek@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/11/13 7:14 pm, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I tested 4.2.1 with our custom vpc gateway on nvp patch basic usage in
>>>a adnvanced zone with niciranvp or with vlans work That means creating
>>>an standalone network or a vpc with a tier and in all cases with an
>>>instance being able to ping the outside world. I encountered one
>>>strange exception:
>>>
>>>WARN  [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-6:) Caught:
>>>java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string:
>>>"63424ecc-ee5c-49a0-b880-d1f879593822"
>>>    at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(Unknown Source)
>>>    at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Unknown Source)
>>>    at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Unknown Source)
>>>    at
>>>com.cloud.consoleproxy.AgentHookBase.onConsoleAccessAuthentication(Agent
>>>Ho
>>>okBase.java:135)
>>>    at
>>>com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyListener.processControlCommand(Consol
>>>eP
>>>roxyListener.java:61)
>>>    at
>>>com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.handleControlCommand(AgentManag
>>>er
>>>Impl.java:347)
>>>    at
>>>com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.access$200(AgentManagerImpl.jav
>>>a:
>>>144)
>>>    at
>>>com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl$AgentHandler.processRequest(Age
>>>nt
>>>ManagerImpl.java:1260)
>>>    at
>>>com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl$AgentHandler.doTask(AgentManage
>>>rI
>>>mpl.java:1348)
>>>    at
>>>com.cloud.agent.manager.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl$ClusteredAgentHandler.
>>>do
>>>Task(ClusteredAgentManagerImpl.java:666)
>>>    at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)
>>>    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
>>>    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
>>>Source)
>>>    at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>>>
>>>I will now test to rule out the patch for this though it is in
>>>untouched code. I will enter a ticket or hold my peace forever after.
>>>
>>>btw, this is a pre-vote thread for these kinds of reports is it?
>>>
>> I think it is fine to highlight issues if any, I will wait for you final
>> say on this ?
>> Though I hope I do not carry the burden of this release to collab next
>> week :-)
>>
>> -abhi
>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message