cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
Date Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:40:30 GMT
+1 binding (I had not been clear on this in this thread it seems)

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
<Abhinandan.Prateek@citrix.com> wrote:
> Marcus,
>
>   Just summarising your concerns so that they can be followed upon:
> 1. Due to a VR script change a restart of VR is required. This should be
> noted down in upgrade instructions in RN. (Radhika to note)
> 2. For a maintenance release we should limit the scope to only blockers. I
> guess what is done is done probably for better as the main release had so
> many new features that a whole lot fixes were expected in the maintenance
> release. But again for further maintenance releases scope should be
> restricted to important fixes.
>
> Any other thing that has been missed ?
>
> -abhi
>
>
> On 14/11/13 12:06 am, "Marcus Sorensen" <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I'm unable to deploy virtual machines after upgrading an existing
>>4.2.0 to this release.
>>
>>It looks like the file savepassword.sh was added at the end of October
>>as a virtual router script. This would likely mean that people
>>upgrading to 4.2.1 will need to upgrade/redeploy their routers. I can
>>verify that deploy works if I reboot the router.
>>
>>Looking over the current state of 4.2, I'm actually pretty surprised
>>at how much has changed. I'm seeing lots of whitespace fixes, changes
>>to interfaces, etc. My impression was that we'd only commit fixes for
>>blocker bugs once a release has gone production, only touching it if
>>we had to. This went pretty well with 4.1, I thought, but everything
>>was going through the RM that round.
>>
>>2013-11-13 11:25:24,917 DEBUG
>>[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>>(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Executing:
>>/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
>>savepassword.sh 169.254.1.163 -v 10.2.4.116 -p fnirq_cnffjbeq
>>
>>2013-11-13 11:25:25,000 DEBUG
>>[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>>(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Exit value is 127
>>
>>2013-11-13 11:25:25,001 DEBUG
>>[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>>(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) bash: /opt/cloud/bin/savepassword.sh: No
>>such file or directory
>>
>>2013-11-13 11:25:25,002 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>>(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Seq 21-289734823:  { Ans: , MgmtId:
>>90520732090445, via: 21, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":"Unable to
>>save password to
>>DomR.","wait":0}},{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":
>>"Stopped
>>by previous failure","wait":0}}] }
>>
>>On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Chip Childers <chipchilders@apache.org>
>>wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
>>> <Abhinandan.Prateek@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance
>>>>release.
>>>> For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested
>>>>apart from regression tests and BVTs.
>>>> Around 175 bugs have been fixed some new features added (see CHANGES).
>>>>
>>>> Following are the particulars for this release:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=re
>>>>fs/heads/4.2
>>>> commit: 0b9eadaf14513f5c72de672963b0e2f12ee7206f
>>>>
>>>> List of changes:
>>>>
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=
>>>>CHANGES;hb=4.2.1
>>>>
>>>> Source release revision 3492 (checksums and signatures are available
>>>>at the same location):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.1/
>>>>
>>>> PGP release keys (signed using RSA Key ID = 42443AA1):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours (until 11/15 End of day PST).
>>>>
>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>>>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> I only performed very rudimentary functional testing, but the
>>> artifact's look legit.
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this Abhi!
>

Mime
View raw message