cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chipchild...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes
Date Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:12:49 GMT
There is absolutely no ASF rule or policy on this.  It's up to
projects to decide things like "what's in the release".

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't imagine there not being some guideline or rule about providing
> documentation in the apache foundation. Can we even release without docs,
> not that we should. My idea was that we release on wednesday with the docs
> in rc state. Even that is, admitted, dubious.
>
> mobile biligual spell checker used
> Op 14 nov. 2013 22:50 schreef "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us>:
>
>> I agree - announcing a release prior to docs availability hurts the
>> project because users fail in installation and upgrades.
>> The gate in my mind is docs readiness - thats an integral part of the
>> release process, even if the repo is separate.
>>
>> Animesh, whats your reason to want to push this out earlier?
>>
>> --David
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Chip Childers <chipchilders@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing + voting
>> > during doc finalization.  If we announce before docs, it hurts us.
>> > I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in poor
>> > shape.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
>> > <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>> >> Unless there are objection to the RC, I would prefer to have it
>> released and make the announcement sooner and showcase in collab
>> conference. As Chip mentions docs were broken out separately anyway.
>> >>
>> >> Animesh
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 14/11/13 8:12 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" <runseb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Anyway we can wait next week to release.
>> >>>
>> >>>quite a few of us will be together in Amsterdam, we can dedicate a
>> >>>hackathon session to 4.2.1 , make sure RN are good, upgrade path
>> >>>etcŠthen testŠ.
>> >>>
>> >>>I'd recommend keeping the vote open until then.
>> >>>
>> >>>-sebastien
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
>> >>><radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The master has the most up-to-date RN for 4.2.1.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek
>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:22 PM
>> >>>> To: CloudStack Dev
>> >>>> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It seems the upgrade section of release notes will require a review,
>> >>>>probably followed by a revamp (?).
>> >>>> Can we have some volunteers who are familiar with various upgrade
>> >>>>paths comment on it ?
>> >>>> Me and Radhika will try to consolidate those comments, snippets
and
>> >>>>fix the RN for 4.2.1.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -abhi
>> >>>>
>> >>>> RN for 4.2.1 =
>> >>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git;a=tree;f
>> >>>>=re
>> >>>>lease-notes;h=8128d62c39236331492f3642914bf97b43ed2670;hb=refs/heads/4
>> >>>>.2
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>

Mime
View raw message