Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 212E7103E4 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61643 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2013 16:09:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 61288 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2013 16:09:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 61280 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2013 16:09:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:09:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.165.176.89] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:09:34 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,514,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="64647167" Received: from sinpex01cl01.citrite.net ([10.151.46.32]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 17 Oct 2013 16:09:11 +0000 Received: from SINPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([169.254.2.76]) by SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([10.151.46.32]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:09:09 +0800 From: Santhosh Edukulla To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: RE: Cloudstack collab Hackathons Thread-Topic: Cloudstack collab Hackathons Thread-Index: AQHOxl4Xu++UWPWRMkOGgeg5oRO8g5nzvqkAgAAjlgCAA7HDAIAA8aeAgACO8J8= Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:09:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <34973ACA-CC08-4118-8C89-2C5943F5AE40@gmail.com> <92A25C97-801D-4E37-A012-92442A5D1891@gmail.com> <30673726-EAED-4FE1-AA49-EE36C97C0289@gmail.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.151.46.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Marcus,=0A= =0A= 1/ For me, its not about the debate of Java VS python, or supporting anythi= ng to re-write existing already. Its an effort, learning,idea and thought o= f contribution being new. Having said that, we worked earlier on building= an agent prototype where we had to deploy agents and push policies, to mu= ltiple agents residing on multiple machines. While working on this, we chos= e python and it went smooth. I agree to your point though, that we should n= ot redo for the sake of doing some thing. =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Thanks!=0A= Santhosh=0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Marcus Sorensen [shadowsor@gmail.com]=0A= Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:19 AM=0A= To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org=0A= Subject: Re: Cloudstack collab Hackathons=0A= =0A= I'm not at all against it, I just haven't heard anyone give any reason=0A= as to why. Keep in mind that we'd essentially be asking anyone who=0A= has written code for the agent to re-do their work (midonet, vxlan,=0A= storage plugins). My impression is that people just like the 'feel'=0A= of it being in Python, and for good reason, but that ignores the fact=0A= that 1) we've already done the work, and 2) features still require=0A= java knowledge since the agent doesn't do anything the mgmt server=0A= doesn't ask for. Without anyone explaining why, it just sort of feels=0A= like rearranging deck chairs on a boat with serious leaks going on=0A= below deck. Worse, people brought their own chairs, and we threw them=0A= overboard because they're now the wrong color.=0A= =0A= On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Darren Shepherd=0A= wrote:=0A= > +1 for kvm in python. I'd like to take it a step further. I'd like to c= reate a framework for adding compute and storage with python drivers. The f= irst implementation should just happen to be libvirt/kvm. So yeah, I'll be= interested in this. I'll be landing around 10am so don't know what time I= 'll get to the hackathon.=0A= >=0A= > Darren=0A= >=0A= >> On Oct 14, 2013, at 9:29 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote= :=0A= >>=0A= >>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Sebastien Goasguen = wrote:=0A= >>>=0A= >>>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 4:43 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:= =0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Hey Guys,=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> The CloudStack collaboration conference is right around the corner. Th= e first day of the conference will be dedicated to workshops and a hackatho= n.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> I'm curious which developers are planning to attend the hackthon and w= hat subjects you are interested in. In Santa Clara we had a short list of s= ome subjects to discuss and some tables and discussions were already prepar= ed in advance. In the upcoming conference we can do the same, so if you hav= e a discussion or project idea that you want to work on at the hackthon let= us know with a reply in this thread.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> I'm also curious if there are any aspiring developers that would like = to have a sort of introduction into cloudstack development during the hacka= thon.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> If you have any other ideas, just shout.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Cheers,=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Hugo=0A= >>>=0A= >>> I am adding couple topics that I would like to see:=0A= >>>=0A= >>> -API interfaces (AWS refactor, GCE, OCCI&CIMI standard): Discuss the st= ate of our interfaces, plans for future, needs etc. AWS interface might nee= d a refactor, GCE is a new interface, OCCI is a standard and Isaac Chiang h= as developed an interface. We are missing a CIMI interface.=0A= >>>=0A= >>> -DOCs: We are having lots of talks about docs, they have been split in = a separate repo, we need to discuss format, release life cycle, format etc.= =0A= >>>=0A= >>> -KVM agent: There has been discussions/wishes to re-write the KVM agent= in something else than Java. Review architecture, define a plan, find deve= lopers :)=0A= >>=0A= >> What? First I've heard of it! I'm not sure how I feel about that. On=0A= >> one side, it seems reasonable to do it in something like python and=0A= >> remove the java dependency on the KVM host. On the other hand, there's= =0A= >> a lot of technical debt in what's been built already, while it would=0A= >> probably be almost trivial to set up a basic working agent, it seems=0A= >> like a significant amount of work to transfer all of the=0A= >> functionality, special code that works around libvirt bugs, etc. Not=0A= >> to mention agent plugins that have already had a significant amount of= =0A= >> effort put into them. On top of that, I'm not sure there's a whole lot= =0A= >> of value if the motive is to attract non-java guys or admins, when the= =0A= >> agent's features rely on what the mgmt server can do (new=0A= >> features/capabilities would require java code anyway, or at the very=0A= >> least coordinated effort between multiple devs who want the same=0A= >> feature).=0A= >>=0A= >>>=0A= >>> -Ecosystem: The are lots of tools in the cloud ecosystem, we should tal= k about docker, ansible, cloud foundry/bosh=85etc.and define a plan to have= great cloudstack support in all of those.=0A= >>>=0A= >>> -sebastien=0A= >>>=0A= >>>=0A=