Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2B7A10DD2 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 01:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19222 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2013 01:26:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 19126 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2013 01:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 19118 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2013 01:26:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 01:26:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com designates 209.85.192.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.176] (HELO mail-pd0-f176.google.com) (209.85.192.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 01:25:56 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q10so163393pdj.21 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:25:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mbJIi6U829646Iafoy+owpVcWBrg2BOxzrZIfVBYK+0=; b=Jv9DaiLI6UBAC6qEgNIfIuzXznFUyxBRdtYRob1fBQnEZKq8Y7HweTuXlY9CqO1zp3 RtgYmSYADBbcfafg8+VJE/L5ndUdFj6L0Qy1HEWEJZfTynLe+Z7iRfbBBJeUNSEqrbIU znxHoluZWJQsRkKPzYVQSZYYUAmUumrWh2oE9OUUNYhvqbPvJLvLTBpctmk+4Ao+mGLi sVbHUBIY3efImXbpsJkI7+wPvzC4d9EhHryOag8NSPaC0xer7xp74U00TkYmr5kEmH74 h/BbwXOazRjKtkKi3HlWPHNkOeIds0gYG4LzbAX142CnjgfuuIR1IiBPNp6/B1gEashU aRKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlmasVRPLIazRWas+pNwN0LFGWa41XoJSVpgI3RvV8H2TKEznVkYC2QFFEfdgp+/Zrq15BI MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.101.225 with SMTP id fj1mr32684983pbb.8.1380677135152; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.78.170 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:25:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:25:35 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hypervisor Questions From: Mike Tutkowski To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b67328830ce7704e7b7f24c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b67328830ce7704e7b7f24c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh, and, yes, when I referred to HA, it was (as you said) with the meaning of a host going offline and VMs being restarted on other hosts (perhaps in a prioritized order if there are an insufficient number of resources to support all of the VMs that were running on the downed host). Does CS support assigning a priority to a VM in case not all VMs can be restarted on the remaining resources? On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Thanks, Clayton! > > Yeah, copy/paste mistake there. :) I meant it as you said. > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Clayton Weise wrote: > >> First, I think you meant to put XenServer, KVM, and VMware and not >> XenServer 3 times in a row. That being said I think in all cases (someb= ody >> correct me if I'm wrong here) it goes something like this: >> >> Live Migration: Request is made by CS but carried out by the HV. >> High Availability: More accurately it's "recovery after host failure" >> because it's still a disruptive action when a host goes sideways, but by >> default this is handled by CS. I _think_ there's an option to let the H= V >> handle this but I'm not totally sure. >> DRS: Managed by CS through one of several methods with the global settin= g >> vm.allocation.algorithm (see below) >> >> 'random', 'firstfit', 'userdispersing', 'userconcentratedpod_random', >> 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit' : Order in which hosts within a cluster w= ill >> be considered for VM/volume allocation. >> >> That being said, after deployment there isn't any further DRS monitoring= ; >> it's only done at the time an instance is instantiated. >> >> -Clayton >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:00 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Hypervisor Questions >> >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if people could clarify for me what CloudStack manages >> versus what the hypervisor manages in terms of live migration, high >> availability, and distributed resource scheduling? >> >> I know it is probably different for XenServer, VMware, and KVM. >> >> Can people fill in the info below (managed by the management server, the >> hypervisor, or some combination of both)? >> >> XenServer >> Live migration: >> High availability: >> Distributed Resource Scheduling: >> >> XenServer >> Live migration: >> High availability: >> Distributed Resource Scheduling: >> >> XenServer >> Live migration: >> High availability: >> Distributed Resource Scheduling: >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> *Mike Tutkowski* >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com >> o: 303.746.7302 >> Advancing the way the world uses the >> cloud >> *(tm)* >> > > > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > *=99* > --=20 *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud *=99* --047d7b67328830ce7704e7b7f24c--