Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sweller@ena.com designates
 96.5.1.12 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:55:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Simon Weller <sweller@ena.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Message-ID: <55011872.12086241.1380664541997.JavaMail.root@ena.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE709085.2E4E2%chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_12086240_1583240607.1380664541996"

------=_Part_12086240_1583240607.1380664541996
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

supervisord maybe? 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Chiradeep Vittal" <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 4:45:56 PM 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router 

Got it. Any other OSS tool out there similar to monit? 

On 10/1/13 8:24 AM, "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us> wrote: 

>On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Chiradeep Vittal 
><Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote: 
>> SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts. It 
>>is 
>> simply too generic for the requirements outlined here. The proposal does 
>> not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger the 
>> AGPL. 
> 
>Let me restate my objection to anything AGPL. 
>People are largely comfortable with GPLv2 software - Linux is 
>ubiquitous. Many legal departments routinely prohibit GPLv3 software 
>(we actually saw this when CS was GPLv3 licensed.) But the Affero GPL 
>license is anathema in many corporate environments, and by forcing it 
>on folks in the default System VM I fear it will hurt adoption of 
>CloudStack. 
> 
>--David 


------=_Part_12086240_1583240607.1380664541996--