Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-46331-apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8212410582
	for <apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 54587 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2013 09:15:02 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54426 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2013 09:14:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cloudstack.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54341 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2013 09:14:47 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:14:47 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of runseb@gmail.com designates
 74.125.83.52 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.83.52] (HELO mail-ee0-f52.google.com) (74.125.83.52)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:14:43 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id e49so467184eek.25
        for <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
        bh=mMtU2Mn9WXNq91f2kt0NunTWV90alwdDRRFpE1NLqxc=;
        b=swEevsTSzyYF1HsDmNG5qliy4kbucM8eMnkYlqgd0pxl/bUK4vnjBsocZ3/qJI6LQq
         Tyk+8l2jLyejP6VF9kgyfXJmq8YAMgWM2rcdgjwY0/QVKkIuGm3CPM+8Y6aQZ0iGADNI
         TfU44yjjWHhUJy9ay/AybzykCqIDJdnsmQD/gZzoWb2yQJdStU7vmWEEEDHGkTMt9oZl
         cHVd8fJoC2MgTjqPz+4QG8hjMjWGksZbp+vBu1V09GfNul7sgHEQmXsO6CtdUnAMY/7q
         yzWyo+hs/GqUVxMK7IEzFN/K6/bOkIpawA7kp+bzobY5+WDsf5JCGh4nCuSNT7fKCfkB
         cKVA==
X-Received: by 10.15.76.65 with SMTP id m41mr1208643eey.94.1383124461885;
        Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172-1-1-105.lightspeed.hstntx.sbcglobal.net
 (dyn.144-85-129-077.dsl.vtx.ch. [144.85.129.77])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 h45sm81042996eeg.5.2013.10.30.02.14.19
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Subject: Re: Docker?
From: Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0adf733bed995837ccb8831b1f2085bd@li.nux.ro>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 05:14:21 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0133AB75-2FEB-4EFD-BD3E-164D0DF428FE@gmail.com>
References: <0adf733bed995837ccb8831b1f2085bd@li.nux.ro>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org,
 Nguyen Anh Tu <ng.tuna@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:56 AM, Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> Docker[1] seems to be all the rage these days and has breathed new =
life in LXC. Is there any interest whatsoever from the devs to support =
for it?
> I noticed it has already landed in the other stack.
>=20

The answer is yes :)

Nugyen has started looking at it, so as Darren.

Can you start a wiki page to dump some ideas, there are some interesting =
architectural decision to be had.

-sebastien

> Lucian
>=20
> [1] - http://www.docker.io/
>=20
> --=20
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>=20
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro