cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router
Date Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:42:09 GMT
Well just make sure that your script is resilient to its own crashes as
well.

On 10/4/13 1:59 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" <jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com>
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I am planning to write script utility to monitor processes and restart on
>the event of failure. It will also logs the events.
>
>Thanks,
>Jayapal
>
>On 02-Oct-2013, at 3:25 AM, Simon Weller <sweller@ena.com> wrote:
>
>> supervisord maybe?
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> 
>> From: "Chiradeep Vittal" <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com>
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 4:45:56 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router
>> 
>> Got it. Any other OSS tool out there similar to monit?
>> 
>> On 10/1/13 8:24 AM, "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
>>> <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts.
>>>>It 
>>>> is 
>>>> simply too generic for the requirements outlined here. The proposal
>>>>does 
>>>> not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger
>>>>the 
>>>> AGPL. 
>>> 
>>> Let me restate my objection to anything AGPL.
>>> People are largely comfortable with GPLv2 software - Linux is
>>> ubiquitous. Many legal departments routinely prohibit GPLv3 software
>>> (we actually saw this when CS was GPLv3 licensed.) But the Affero GPL
>>> license is anathema in many corporate environments, and by forcing it
>>> on folks in the default System VM I fear it will hurt adoption of
>>> CloudStack. 
>>> 
>>> --David 
>> 
>> 
>


Mime
View raw message