cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nguyen Anh Tu <ng.t...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: Autoscaling
Date Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:56:29 GMT
Got it. Thanks Sowmya.

Sent from my GT-N7000
On Oct 11, 2013 4:51 PM, "Sowmya Krishnan" <sowmya.krishnan@citrix.com>
wrote:

> Answer inline...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nguyen Anh Tu [mailto:ng.tuna@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 12:14 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Autoscaling
> >
> > Dear Rajesh,
> >
> > Apologize for delay in response.
> >
> > You mean the netscaler api's used to create the autoscale functionality?
> > >
> >
> > Yes. And I just found a document about Netscaler config:
> > http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/ns-system-10-map/ns-autoscale-
> > automatic-scaling-in-cloudplatform-env-wrapper-con.html
> > more info from:
> >
> http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/30564-102-684000/NS-
> > CommandReference-Guide.pdf
> >
> > Also looking through Netscaler plugin implementation into ACS, I can
> understand
> > the operation.
> >
> > Btw, I'm confusing about this points:
> >
> > - When user change templateID in a AutoScale group, don't Netscaler call
> ACS to
> > destroy old VMs? Then, there are two type of VMs in that group: one with
> old
> > template and one with new template. Is it right?
> >
> When user changes template, Netscaler doesn't destroy VMs created with
> older template. VMs of both templates will co-exist in the autoscale group.
> Subsequent VMs that get created will use the new template. As long as the
> Scale down policy is not met, VMs won't be destroyed.
>
> > Thanks,
> > --
> >
> > N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message